Instrumen Penilaian Nyeri pada Anak dengan Gangguan Kognitif: A Literatute Review

Dhina Widayati
{"title":"Instrumen Penilaian Nyeri pada Anak dengan Gangguan Kognitif: A Literatute Review","authors":"Dhina Widayati","doi":"10.20884/1.bion.2021.3.2.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Difficulty in assessing pain in someone who cannot express the pain they feel, for example in children with cognitive impairment, provides a significant obstacle in pain management. The purpose of this study is to review the literature containing pain assessment instruments in children with cognitive impairment and to discuss instruments that can be applied effectively and have clinical use. \nMethod: Search for English articles in the Medline, Cinahl, and PubMed databases, and is limited from 1990 to 2013. Through keywords according to topic and obtained 5 articles that were reviewed. \nResult : Pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment can be done through rFLACC, NCCPC-PV, NCCPC-R and NAPI. rFLACC is the most effective instrument and has great clinical utility with ICC : 0.73-0.9). \nAnalysis: rFLACC assesses 5 indicators (face expression, leg, activity, cry & consoability) that are simpler and easier to apply to all children with cognitive impairment at all levels. \nDiscussion: Elective postoperative pain assessment in clinical settings in children with cognitive impairment can be performed with rFLACC. In an effort to increase the reliability of the instrument, the improvement of leg items and activities can be the basis for further research.","PeriodicalId":181487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bionursing","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bionursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.bion.2021.3.2.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Difficulty in assessing pain in someone who cannot express the pain they feel, for example in children with cognitive impairment, provides a significant obstacle in pain management. The purpose of this study is to review the literature containing pain assessment instruments in children with cognitive impairment and to discuss instruments that can be applied effectively and have clinical use. Method: Search for English articles in the Medline, Cinahl, and PubMed databases, and is limited from 1990 to 2013. Through keywords according to topic and obtained 5 articles that were reviewed. Result : Pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment can be done through rFLACC, NCCPC-PV, NCCPC-R and NAPI. rFLACC is the most effective instrument and has great clinical utility with ICC : 0.73-0.9). Analysis: rFLACC assesses 5 indicators (face expression, leg, activity, cry & consoability) that are simpler and easier to apply to all children with cognitive impairment at all levels. Discussion: Elective postoperative pain assessment in clinical settings in children with cognitive impairment can be performed with rFLACC. In an effort to increase the reliability of the instrument, the improvement of leg items and activities can be the basis for further research.
对无法表达疼痛感的人(例如有认知障碍的儿童)难以评估疼痛,这是疼痛管理的一个重大障碍。本研究的目的是回顾包含认知障碍儿童疼痛评估工具的文献,并讨论可以有效应用和具有临床用途的工具。方法:在Medline、Cinahl和PubMed数据库中检索英文文章,检索时间限定为1990 - 2013年。根据主题通过关键词,获得5篇文章进行评审。结果:rFLACC、NCCPC-PV、NCCPC-R和NAPI可用于认知功能障碍儿童的疼痛评估。rFLACC是最有效的仪器,在ICC(0.73-0.9)有很大的临床应用价值。分析:rFLACC评估了5个指标(面部表情、腿部、活动、哭泣和安慰),这5个指标更简单,更容易适用于所有各级认知障碍儿童。讨论:选择性术后疼痛评估在临床设置的儿童认知功能障碍可以进行rFLACC。为了提高仪器的可靠性,对腿部项目和活动的改进可以作为进一步研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信