{"title":"The European Union and the Council of Europe","authors":"S. Calabresi","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075736.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses two final supranational mixed civil law and common law jurisdictions, which are comparable in size, population, and GDP to the United States of America, to India, to the former British Empire, and to Brazil. These jurisdictions had two common law members prior to Brexit becoming a reality in 2020: the United Kingdom and Ireland. These two supranational jurisdictions are, of course, the European Union (EU) and the Council of Europe. The origins and growth of the power of judicial review in the EU is a very complicated tale of federalism umpiring giving rise to judicial power. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) successfully asserted its power between 1963 and 1989 to hear individual rights claims, as it enlisted the member courts of the EU over that period of time in the project of enforcing EU law as being supreme over the later-in-time law of the EU nation-states. The ECJ persuaded the national courts of the EU’s member states that (1) EU law had a direct effect in the member nations, and (2) that EU law was supreme over the post-1958 laws enacted by the EU member nations. The chapter then explains the origins and growth in power of the Council of Europe’s European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). This enterprise began for rights from wrongs reasons and has grown in power for supranational umpiring reasons.","PeriodicalId":286371,"journal":{"name":"The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075736.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This chapter discusses two final supranational mixed civil law and common law jurisdictions, which are comparable in size, population, and GDP to the United States of America, to India, to the former British Empire, and to Brazil. These jurisdictions had two common law members prior to Brexit becoming a reality in 2020: the United Kingdom and Ireland. These two supranational jurisdictions are, of course, the European Union (EU) and the Council of Europe. The origins and growth of the power of judicial review in the EU is a very complicated tale of federalism umpiring giving rise to judicial power. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) successfully asserted its power between 1963 and 1989 to hear individual rights claims, as it enlisted the member courts of the EU over that period of time in the project of enforcing EU law as being supreme over the later-in-time law of the EU nation-states. The ECJ persuaded the national courts of the EU’s member states that (1) EU law had a direct effect in the member nations, and (2) that EU law was supreme over the post-1958 laws enacted by the EU member nations. The chapter then explains the origins and growth in power of the Council of Europe’s European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). This enterprise began for rights from wrongs reasons and has grown in power for supranational umpiring reasons.
本章讨论了两个最终的超国家混合民法和普通法司法管辖区,它们在面积、人口和GDP方面与美国、印度、前大英帝国和巴西相当。在2020年英国脱欧成为现实之前,这些司法管辖区有两个普通法成员国:英国和爱尔兰。当然,这两个超国家的司法管辖区是欧盟(EU)和欧洲委员会(Council of Europe)。欧盟司法审查权的起源和发展是一个由联邦制裁判产生司法权的复杂故事。欧洲法院(ECJ)在1963年至1989年期间成功地维护了其听取个人权利诉求的权力,因为它在执行欧盟法律的项目中招募了欧盟成员国法院,使其高于欧盟民族国家后来的法律。欧洲法院说服了欧盟成员国的国家法院:(1)欧盟法律对成员国有直接影响,(2)欧盟法律高于1958年后欧盟成员国颁布的法律。本章接着解释了欧洲委员会的欧洲人权法院(ECHR)的起源和权力的增长。这一事业因是非对错的原因而开始,并因超国家的裁判原因而发展壮大。