Teachers' and Pupils' Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge of Natural Phenomena

M. Ogunniyi
{"title":"Teachers' and Pupils' Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge of Natural Phenomena","authors":"M. Ogunniyi","doi":"10.1080/10288457.2000.10756120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The interface between school science and indigenous knowledge has until recently been ignored in curriculum development efforts throughout the world. However, in the last decade or so, for one reason or the other, a greater attention has been paid to this crucial subject. One obvious phenomenon forcing this subject to the fore perhaps, is the challenge of cultural identity in an era of rapid socio-economic and educational globalization. Today, science teachers in many a South African classroom is confronted with the enormous task of communicating science to pupils from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds. In fact, it might not be far fetched to suspect that both teachers and learners in South Africa as elsewhere, are faced with the massive challenge of “border crossing” (Aikenhead & Jegede, 1999) between school science and indigenous knowledge of diverse natural phenomena. The report presented in this paper seems to buttress this suspicion. An analysis of the responses of 40 science teachers and 92 primary and junior secondary school pupils in the Western Cape to eight fictitious stories about nature reveals the existence of both the scientific and the indigenous notions about nature. As expected, the teachers appear to learn more towards the scientific world view than their students. In certain cases there are similarities between the teachers' and their pupils' world views about nature while in others they are different. While some of the notions held by the subjects about nature are similar to that of science others are distinctly different. This paper provides a documentary evidence of the interplay between two distinct world views within the framework of critical theory. It attempts to explore the underlying mechanism of border crossing in terms of the so-called contiguity hypothesis as well as highlighted the physiological/logico-metalogical implications of the phenomenon of dualistic mentality for mass scientific and technological literacy or what has been termed, “public understanding of science and technology” in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":421869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2000.10756120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

ABSTRACT The interface between school science and indigenous knowledge has until recently been ignored in curriculum development efforts throughout the world. However, in the last decade or so, for one reason or the other, a greater attention has been paid to this crucial subject. One obvious phenomenon forcing this subject to the fore perhaps, is the challenge of cultural identity in an era of rapid socio-economic and educational globalization. Today, science teachers in many a South African classroom is confronted with the enormous task of communicating science to pupils from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds. In fact, it might not be far fetched to suspect that both teachers and learners in South Africa as elsewhere, are faced with the massive challenge of “border crossing” (Aikenhead & Jegede, 1999) between school science and indigenous knowledge of diverse natural phenomena. The report presented in this paper seems to buttress this suspicion. An analysis of the responses of 40 science teachers and 92 primary and junior secondary school pupils in the Western Cape to eight fictitious stories about nature reveals the existence of both the scientific and the indigenous notions about nature. As expected, the teachers appear to learn more towards the scientific world view than their students. In certain cases there are similarities between the teachers' and their pupils' world views about nature while in others they are different. While some of the notions held by the subjects about nature are similar to that of science others are distinctly different. This paper provides a documentary evidence of the interplay between two distinct world views within the framework of critical theory. It attempts to explore the underlying mechanism of border crossing in terms of the so-called contiguity hypothesis as well as highlighted the physiological/logico-metalogical implications of the phenomenon of dualistic mentality for mass scientific and technological literacy or what has been termed, “public understanding of science and technology” in South Africa.
教师和学生对自然现象的科学知识和本土知识
直到最近,学校科学和本土知识之间的界面在世界各地的课程开发工作中一直被忽视。然而,在过去十年左右的时间里,由于这样或那样的原因,人们对这个关键问题给予了更多的关注。在社会经济和教育迅速全球化的时代,文化认同的挑战可能是迫使这一主题突出的一个明显现象。今天,南非许多教室的科学教师面临着向来自不同社会文化背景的学生传授科学知识的艰巨任务。事实上,怀疑南非和其他地方的教师和学习者都面临着学校科学与各种自然现象的土著知识之间“跨越边界”的巨大挑战(Aikenhead & Jegede, 1999),这可能并不遥远。这份报告似乎支持了这种怀疑。对西开普省40名科学教师和92名中小学生对8个关于自然的虚构故事的反应进行了分析,揭示了科学和土著关于自然的观念的存在。不出所料,教师似乎比学生更了解科学世界观。在某些情况下,教师和学生对自然的世界观有相似之处,而在另一些情况下则不同。虽然科目所持有的关于自然的一些概念与科学的概念相似,但其他概念却截然不同。本文提供了批判理论框架内两种截然不同的世界观之间相互作用的文献证据。它试图根据所谓的邻近假设来探讨跨越边界的潜在机制,并强调了南非大众科学和技术素养或所谓的“公众对科学和技术的理解”的二元心态现象的生理/逻辑-元学含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信