Logic

Michael Potter
{"title":"Logic","authors":"Michael Potter","doi":"10.4324/9781315776187-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"higher-order intuitionistic Some torsion-free Applying automated reasoning technology to research: our experiences; logical problems of programming Fixed-point theorems in a general Early work in automated theorem proving characterized by wild enthusiasm and modest results. These experiences, in addition to insights concerning the computational complexity of general-purpose algorithms, resulted in a widespread skepticism concerning the potential of general-purpose theorem proving systems based on the first-order predicate calculus. the early expectations were not achieved, the reaction against general-purpose systems was excessive. 1977, researchers Argonne exploring the possibility of utilizing automated theorem provers to aid in attacking open questions in mathematics. We experienced many disappointments and some successes. Open questions have been successfully answered in areas such as finite semigroups, ternary Boolean algebras, and equivalential calculus. Current work includes problems from a variety of other areas in mathematics. Our automated reasoning system has been used both to prove theorems and to derive counterexamples. In this talk, I will try to convey a sense of what types of problems have been successfully addressed, how they were solved, what we have learned from the experiences, and what we anticipate in the near future.","PeriodicalId":368340,"journal":{"name":"The Rise of Analytic Philosophy 1879–1930","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Rise of Analytic Philosophy 1879–1930","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776187-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

higher-order intuitionistic Some torsion-free Applying automated reasoning technology to research: our experiences; logical problems of programming Fixed-point theorems in a general Early work in automated theorem proving characterized by wild enthusiasm and modest results. These experiences, in addition to insights concerning the computational complexity of general-purpose algorithms, resulted in a widespread skepticism concerning the potential of general-purpose theorem proving systems based on the first-order predicate calculus. the early expectations were not achieved, the reaction against general-purpose systems was excessive. 1977, researchers Argonne exploring the possibility of utilizing automated theorem provers to aid in attacking open questions in mathematics. We experienced many disappointments and some successes. Open questions have been successfully answered in areas such as finite semigroups, ternary Boolean algebras, and equivalential calculus. Current work includes problems from a variety of other areas in mathematics. Our automated reasoning system has been used both to prove theorems and to derive counterexamples. In this talk, I will try to convey a sense of what types of problems have been successfully addressed, how they were solved, what we have learned from the experiences, and what we anticipate in the near future.
逻辑
应用自动推理技术进行研究:我们的经验在自动定理证明方面的早期工作以狂热的热情和一般的结果为特点。这些经验,加上对通用算法的计算复杂性的见解,导致了对基于一阶谓词演算的通用定理证明系统的潜力的广泛怀疑。早期的期望没有实现,对通用系统的反应是过度的。1977年,阿贡研究人员探索利用自动定理证明器来帮助解决数学中的开放性问题的可能性。我们经历了许多失望和一些成功。在有限半群、三元布尔代数和等价微积分等领域,已经成功地回答了开放问题。目前的工作包括来自各种数学其他领域的问题。我们的自动推理系统既被用来证明定理,也被用来推导反例。在这次演讲中,我将试图传达一种感觉,即哪些类型的问题已经成功解决,它们是如何解决的,我们从这些经验中学到了什么,以及我们对不久的将来有什么预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信