Dron’t Stop Me Now: Prioritizing Drone Journalism in Commercial Drone Regulation

David A Fischer
{"title":"Dron’t Stop Me Now: Prioritizing Drone Journalism in Commercial Drone Regulation","authors":"David A Fischer","doi":"10.7916/JLA.V43I1.4127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New technologies that simplify lives and improve our understanding of the world around us inevitably pose new, difficult legal questions. This maxim is true for commercial drones. The recent proliferation of these devices creates a multitude of opportunities for commercial use. To borrow a phrase from Justice Robert H. Jackson, the ability of drones to navigate the sky like “vagrant clouds”4 also means that these devices pose significant regulatory challenges for federal, state, and local governments. Governments attempting to address the safety, privacy, and region- specific concerns raised by increased commercial drone use must also consider the concomitant burdens placed on commercial drone use. \n \n \n \nThis Note proceeds in four parts. Part I highlights novel journalistic uses of drones for content production and investigative reporting and discusses the pitfalls of under- or overregulating commercial drones. Part II details the current state of federal, state, and local regulation of commercial drone use. Keeping in mind potential changes that may result to the FAA’s Part 107 commercial drone regulations from the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, this Note considers the FAA’s current regulations as a baseline for whether new regulations would help or hinder drone journalism. The state and local picture is more intricate, and this Note discusses those regulations in three parts: safety regulations, privacy regulations, and region-specific regulations. Part III discusses federal safety regulations and the First Amendment and proposes simplifying the regulatory picture by preempting most state and local safety regulations. Part IV examines whether the federal regulatory scheme preempts state and local privacy regulations and common law torts, the application of those common law torts, and First Amendment limitations on state and local privacy regulations. The Conclusion details how an aspiring drone journalist would experience the regulatory scheme proposed herein.","PeriodicalId":222420,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/JLA.V43I1.4127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

New technologies that simplify lives and improve our understanding of the world around us inevitably pose new, difficult legal questions. This maxim is true for commercial drones. The recent proliferation of these devices creates a multitude of opportunities for commercial use. To borrow a phrase from Justice Robert H. Jackson, the ability of drones to navigate the sky like “vagrant clouds”4 also means that these devices pose significant regulatory challenges for federal, state, and local governments. Governments attempting to address the safety, privacy, and region- specific concerns raised by increased commercial drone use must also consider the concomitant burdens placed on commercial drone use. This Note proceeds in four parts. Part I highlights novel journalistic uses of drones for content production and investigative reporting and discusses the pitfalls of under- or overregulating commercial drones. Part II details the current state of federal, state, and local regulation of commercial drone use. Keeping in mind potential changes that may result to the FAA’s Part 107 commercial drone regulations from the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, this Note considers the FAA’s current regulations as a baseline for whether new regulations would help or hinder drone journalism. The state and local picture is more intricate, and this Note discusses those regulations in three parts: safety regulations, privacy regulations, and region-specific regulations. Part III discusses federal safety regulations and the First Amendment and proposes simplifying the regulatory picture by preempting most state and local safety regulations. Part IV examines whether the federal regulatory scheme preempts state and local privacy regulations and common law torts, the application of those common law torts, and First Amendment limitations on state and local privacy regulations. The Conclusion details how an aspiring drone journalist would experience the regulatory scheme proposed herein.
现在不要阻止我:在商业无人机监管中优先考虑无人机新闻
新技术简化了我们的生活,提高了我们对周围世界的理解,不可避免地带来了新的、困难的法律问题。这句格言适用于商用无人机。最近这些设备的激增为商业用途创造了大量机会。借用法官罗伯特·h·杰克逊(Robert H. Jackson)的话来说,无人机像“流云”一样在天空中飞行的能力也意味着,这些设备对联邦、州和地方政府的监管构成了重大挑战。试图解决商业无人机使用增加所带来的安全、隐私和区域特定问题的政府也必须考虑商业无人机使用带来的负担。本说明分为四个部分。第一部分重点介绍了无人机在内容生产和调查性报道中的新奇新闻用途,并讨论了商业无人机监管不足或过度监管的陷阱。第二部分详细介绍了目前联邦、州和地方对商业无人机使用的监管。考虑到2018年联邦航空局再授权法案可能导致联邦航空局第107部分商用无人机法规的潜在变化,本说明将联邦航空局的现行法规视为新法规是否有助于或阻碍无人机新闻的基线。州和地方的情况更为复杂,本文将从三个部分讨论这些法规:安全法规、隐私法规和地区法规。第三部分讨论了联邦安全法规和第一修正案,并建议通过抢占大多数州和地方安全法规来简化监管情况。第四部分考察联邦监管计划是否优先于州和地方隐私法规和普通法侵权行为,这些普通法侵权行为的适用,以及第一修正案对州和地方隐私法规的限制。结论详细说明了一个有抱负的无人机记者将如何体验本文提出的监管计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信