HEURISTIC EVALUATION ANALYSIS USING THE 10 NIELSEN RULE USABILITY METHOD ON THE KAI ACCESS APPLICATION

Muhammad Syarqim Mahfudz, Febrina Agusti, Sefa Az Zahra, Berliana Rahma Dhini
{"title":"HEURISTIC EVALUATION ANALYSIS USING THE 10 NIELSEN RULE USABILITY METHOD ON THE KAI ACCESS APPLICATION","authors":"Muhammad Syarqim Mahfudz, Febrina Agusti, Sefa Az Zahra, Berliana Rahma Dhini","doi":"10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"KAI Access is the official application owned by PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) for ticket cancellations, changing ticket schedules, purchasing local trains, purchasing train tickets 1 hour before departure, e-boarding passes. Based on the user rating on the Play store, which is 3.3 out of 5 stars. In this study using 10 Nielsen's usability rules, with the aim of analyzing whether the KAI Access application can be said to be good or not. Task Analysis which is classified as efficient enough because the value of the lost ness level is only 0.26651869414146. It was found that from 6 of 10 Jacob Nielsen heuristic evaluations, errors were found to minimize the users memory load, feedback, shortcuts, prevent errors, help and documentation, consistency. The 10 principles of usability that need to be improved in this KAI Access application are the Minimize the users memory load type and the Minimize the users memory load type with the same severity rating 3, namely major with a fixed rating of 2, requiring some effort to fix.","PeriodicalId":415761,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

KAI Access is the official application owned by PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) for ticket cancellations, changing ticket schedules, purchasing local trains, purchasing train tickets 1 hour before departure, e-boarding passes. Based on the user rating on the Play store, which is 3.3 out of 5 stars. In this study using 10 Nielsen's usability rules, with the aim of analyzing whether the KAI Access application can be said to be good or not. Task Analysis which is classified as efficient enough because the value of the lost ness level is only 0.26651869414146. It was found that from 6 of 10 Jacob Nielsen heuristic evaluations, errors were found to minimize the users memory load, feedback, shortcuts, prevent errors, help and documentation, consistency. The 10 principles of usability that need to be improved in this KAI Access application are the Minimize the users memory load type and the Minimize the users memory load type with the same severity rating 3, namely major with a fixed rating of 2, requiring some effort to fix.
应用10尼尔森规则对kai访问应用程序可用性进行启发式评价分析
KAI Access是PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero)拥有的官方应用程序,用于退票,更改车票时间表,购买本地列车,出发前1小时购买火车票,电子登机牌。根据用户在Play商店的评分,这是3.3分(满分5星)。在本研究中,使用10尼尔森的可用性规则,目的是分析KAI Access应用程序是否可以说是好还是不好。任务分析,它被归类为足够高效,因为损失程度的值仅为0.26651869414146。在10个Jacob Nielsen启发式评估中,有6个发现了最小化用户记忆负荷、反馈、快捷方式、防止错误、帮助和文档、一致性的错误。在这个KAI Access应用程序中需要改进的10个可用性原则是最小化用户内存负载类型和最小化用户内存负载类型,它们具有相同的严重性等级3,即具有固定等级2的主要,需要一些努力来修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信