The Comparing Analysis of Drosophila Optimization and Gravitational Search Algorithm

Xiaohua Li
{"title":"The Comparing Analysis of Drosophila Optimization and Gravitational Search Algorithm","authors":"Xiaohua Li","doi":"10.1109/CIS2018.2018.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two evolutionary methods, Drosophila Optimization (DO) and Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), are compared. Important problem of evolutionary methods is how to balance exploitation and exploration. We take a set of numerical experiments to verify the performance of these methods. Numerical results show that GSA is better than DO in convergence rate or accuracy.","PeriodicalId":185099,"journal":{"name":"2018 14th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 14th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS2018.2018.00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, two evolutionary methods, Drosophila Optimization (DO) and Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), are compared. Important problem of evolutionary methods is how to balance exploitation and exploration. We take a set of numerical experiments to verify the performance of these methods. Numerical results show that GSA is better than DO in convergence rate or accuracy.
果蝇优化算法与引力搜索算法的比较分析
本文对果蝇优化算法(Drosophila Optimization, DO)和引力搜索算法(gravity Search Algorithm, GSA)两种进化方法进行了比较。进化方法的一个重要问题是如何平衡开发和探索。通过一组数值实验验证了这些方法的性能。数值结果表明,GSA在收敛速度和精度上都优于DO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信