Comparing different Machine-Learning techniques to predict Vehicles’ Positions using the received Signal Strength of periodic messages

Mamoudou Sangare, Dinh-Van Nguyen, S. Banerjee, P. Mühlethaler, S. Bouzefrane
{"title":"Comparing different Machine-Learning techniques to predict Vehicles’ Positions using the received Signal Strength of periodic messages","authors":"Mamoudou Sangare, Dinh-Van Nguyen, S. Banerjee, P. Mühlethaler, S. Bouzefrane","doi":"10.23919/WMNC.2019.8881819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, vehicles use the beacons sent by Road Side Units (RSUs) to predict their positions on a road. The reception power is strongly influenced by the distance between a vehicle and the neighboring RSUs and thus Machine-Learning can be used to predict the position of vehicles between RSUs. We have to assume that the vehicles know their own positions, at least for a given duration, to build the model of the machine-learning algorithm. This position information can be obtained for instance from a GPS. When this information is no longer available, the machine-learning algorithm can be used to predict the vehicles’ positions. The vehicles can send a position request to the RSUs which will know the reception power of their beacons and the machine-learning algorithm can respond with the estimated position. In this study, we compare four well-known machine-learning techniques : K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neural Network (NN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). We study these techniques with different assumptions and discuss their respective advantages and drawbacks. Our results show that these four techniques provide very good results in terms of position predictions when the error on the transmission power is small.","PeriodicalId":197152,"journal":{"name":"2019 12th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 12th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/WMNC.2019.8881819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, vehicles use the beacons sent by Road Side Units (RSUs) to predict their positions on a road. The reception power is strongly influenced by the distance between a vehicle and the neighboring RSUs and thus Machine-Learning can be used to predict the position of vehicles between RSUs. We have to assume that the vehicles know their own positions, at least for a given duration, to build the model of the machine-learning algorithm. This position information can be obtained for instance from a GPS. When this information is no longer available, the machine-learning algorithm can be used to predict the vehicles’ positions. The vehicles can send a position request to the RSUs which will know the reception power of their beacons and the machine-learning algorithm can respond with the estimated position. In this study, we compare four well-known machine-learning techniques : K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neural Network (NN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). We study these techniques with different assumptions and discuss their respective advantages and drawbacks. Our results show that these four techniques provide very good results in terms of position predictions when the error on the transmission power is small.
比较不同的机器学习技术,利用周期性信息的接收信号强度来预测车辆的位置
在本文中,车辆使用路侧单元(Road Side Units, rsu)发送的信标来预测其在道路上的位置。接收功率受车辆与相邻rsu之间距离的强烈影响,因此机器学习可以用于预测车辆在rsu之间的位置。我们必须假设车辆知道自己的位置,至少在给定的时间内,才能建立机器学习算法的模型。例如,可以从GPS获得该位置信息。当这些信息不再可用时,机器学习算法可以用来预测车辆的位置。车辆可以向rsu发送位置请求,rsu将知道其信标的接收功率,机器学习算法可以根据估计的位置做出响应。在本研究中,我们比较了四种著名的机器学习技术:K近邻(KNN)、神经网络(NN)、随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)。我们在不同的假设下研究了这些技术,并讨论了它们各自的优点和缺点。结果表明,在传输功率误差较小的情况下,这四种方法在位置预测方面具有很好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信