A Comparative Evaluation of Tooth Size Discrepancies in Different Types of Malocclusions by using Bolton\'s Analysis: An Odontometric Study

Harshala S Patil, A. Handa, Uddhav Y Alane
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of Tooth Size Discrepancies in Different Types of Malocclusions by using Bolton\\'s Analysis: An Odontometric Study","authors":"Harshala S Patil, A. Handa, Uddhav Y Alane","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10062-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients attending orthodontic clinics normally complain of crowding or spacing or both, which represents big esthetic and functional problems. The link between the upper and lower teeth sizes and its repercussions on the occlusal harmony of these dental arches is a cause of major concern in orthodontic treatment. Hence, this study is carried out to compare the anterior and overall ratios of tooth sizes in different types of Angle's malocclusions. For this study, we examined and selected 100 patients from the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India and divided into 4 malocclusion groups namely Angle's class I (n = 25), Angle's class II (n = 50) [class II division 1 (n = 25), class II division 2 (n = 25)], Angle's class III (n = 25). For all selected patients the impressions were taken, casts were poured and models were prepared. Then the greatest width of the teeth from the first molar to the contralateral first molar was measured by using a caliper on the study models. The anterior and overall ratios between the maxillary and mandibular teeth were evaluated by using Bolton’s analysis. All the parameters were subjected to statistical analysis.","PeriodicalId":197236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10062-0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients attending orthodontic clinics normally complain of crowding or spacing or both, which represents big esthetic and functional problems. The link between the upper and lower teeth sizes and its repercussions on the occlusal harmony of these dental arches is a cause of major concern in orthodontic treatment. Hence, this study is carried out to compare the anterior and overall ratios of tooth sizes in different types of Angle's malocclusions. For this study, we examined and selected 100 patients from the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India and divided into 4 malocclusion groups namely Angle's class I (n = 25), Angle's class II (n = 50) [class II division 1 (n = 25), class II division 2 (n = 25)], Angle's class III (n = 25). For all selected patients the impressions were taken, casts were poured and models were prepared. Then the greatest width of the teeth from the first molar to the contralateral first molar was measured by using a caliper on the study models. The anterior and overall ratios between the maxillary and mandibular teeth were evaluated by using Bolton’s analysis. All the parameters were subjected to statistical analysis.
不同类型错咬合中牙尺寸差异的博尔顿分析比较研究
到正畸诊所就诊的患者通常会抱怨拥挤或间隔,或两者兼而有之,这代表了很大的审美和功能问题。上下牙大小之间的联系及其对这些牙弓咬合和谐的影响是正畸治疗中主要关注的问题。因此,本研究比较不同类型的Angle错颌的前牙大小与整体牙大小的比值。本研究选取来自印度马哈拉施特拉邦Beed市Aditya牙科学院正畸与牙面矫形科的100例患者,分为Angle的I类(n = 25)、Angle的II类(n = 50) [II类1组(n = 25)、II类2组(n = 25)]、Angle的III类(n = 25) 4个错颌组。对所有选定的患者取印模,浇铸模,制作模型。然后用卡尺在研究模型上测量第一磨牙到对侧第一磨牙的最大牙齿宽度。采用博尔顿分析方法评估上颌牙和下颌骨的前牙和总牙比。所有参数都进行了统计分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信