E-commerce and security

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1998-09-01 DOI:10.1145/324042.324047
W. Diffie
{"title":"E-commerce and security","authors":"W. Diffie","doi":"10.1145/324042.324047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"■ Commerce and security are inseparable. The reason for wanting to buy, sell, trade, and rent goods is that they are valuable, and valuable items, tangible or intangible, always need protection. ot only does commerce require security; it usually requires the best security. Until just over a century ago, merchant ships carried cannon to protect their cargos, and medieval towns often had fortified market squares. Today, the shops on Main Street are watched by video cameras; warehouses boast some of the strongest locks available; and the safes in most grocery stores are stronger than those used to store classified documents. Commercial security may be a constant, but the mechanisms of security change over time. The merchantman’s cannon have gone. Today, radios, aircraft, and the fact that oil-burning ships must come into port for fuel have made big-ship piracy a thing of the past. As new commercial environments develop, new security mechanisms appear to protect them, and inappropriate older ones dissappear. Mechanisms are rarely separable from objectives. The relationship between buyer and seller is not an entirely harmonious one; their aims are different, leading them as much to compete as to cooperate. Under the circumstances, providers of security arrangements are rarely neutral. It is therefore essential in considering the security of a novel commercial medium to take into account the interests of the various participants, and to analyze the impact of proposed security measures on all parties. This is all the more true because security is a word that, in the jargon of diplomacy, stands for legitimacy. It is hard to argue that an organization is not entitled to security, and someone who opposes an action taken in the name of security generally starts from the weaker position. What does security provide to the participants in a transaction? It guarantees to the seller that no one will be able to acquire the goods without paying the price the seller demands. The corresponding expectation on the part of the buyer is that the goods paid for will be delivered in a timely manner and will be as represented. Although this is rarely seen as a security issue and usually goes under the name of consumer protection, a broad analysis of security concerns must take into account the needs of the consumer. There may also be tangential concerns of both parties, particularly the privacy of the transaction and the anonymity or lack thereof of the participants.","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/324042.324047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

■ Commerce and security are inseparable. The reason for wanting to buy, sell, trade, and rent goods is that they are valuable, and valuable items, tangible or intangible, always need protection. ot only does commerce require security; it usually requires the best security. Until just over a century ago, merchant ships carried cannon to protect their cargos, and medieval towns often had fortified market squares. Today, the shops on Main Street are watched by video cameras; warehouses boast some of the strongest locks available; and the safes in most grocery stores are stronger than those used to store classified documents. Commercial security may be a constant, but the mechanisms of security change over time. The merchantman’s cannon have gone. Today, radios, aircraft, and the fact that oil-burning ships must come into port for fuel have made big-ship piracy a thing of the past. As new commercial environments develop, new security mechanisms appear to protect them, and inappropriate older ones dissappear. Mechanisms are rarely separable from objectives. The relationship between buyer and seller is not an entirely harmonious one; their aims are different, leading them as much to compete as to cooperate. Under the circumstances, providers of security arrangements are rarely neutral. It is therefore essential in considering the security of a novel commercial medium to take into account the interests of the various participants, and to analyze the impact of proposed security measures on all parties. This is all the more true because security is a word that, in the jargon of diplomacy, stands for legitimacy. It is hard to argue that an organization is not entitled to security, and someone who opposes an action taken in the name of security generally starts from the weaker position. What does security provide to the participants in a transaction? It guarantees to the seller that no one will be able to acquire the goods without paying the price the seller demands. The corresponding expectation on the part of the buyer is that the goods paid for will be delivered in a timely manner and will be as represented. Although this is rarely seen as a security issue and usually goes under the name of consumer protection, a broad analysis of security concerns must take into account the needs of the consumer. There may also be tangential concerns of both parties, particularly the privacy of the transaction and the anonymity or lack thereof of the participants.
电子商贸与保安
■商业与安全密不可分。购买、出售、交易和租赁商品的原因是它们是有价值的,而有价值的物品,无论是有形的还是无形的,总是需要保护的。商业不仅需要安全;它通常需要最好的安全措施。直到一个多世纪以前,商船还带着大炮来保护货物,中世纪的城镇通常有设防的集市广场。如今,大街上的商店都被摄像机监视着;仓库拥有一些最坚固的锁;而且大多数杂货店的保险柜比用来存放机密文件的保险柜更坚固。商业安全可能是一个常数,但安全机制会随着时间而变化。商人的大炮不见了。如今,无线电、飞机,以及燃油船必须进港加油的事实,已经使大型海盗成为历史。随着新的商业环境的发展,出现了新的安全机制来保护它们,而不合适的旧的安全机制则消失了。机制很少与目标分离。买卖双方的关系并不完全和谐;他们的目标不同,导致他们既竞争又合作。在这种情况下,安全安排的提供者很少是中立的。因此,在考虑一种新型商业媒介的安全性时,必须考虑到各参与者的利益,并分析拟议的安全措施对各方的影响。因为在外交术语中,安全这个词代表着合法性,所以这一点更加正确。很难说一个组织没有资格享有安全,而反对以安全的名义采取行动的人通常是从较弱的立场出发的。安全性为事务中的参与者提供了什么?它向卖方保证,没有人能够在不支付卖方所要求的价格的情况下获得货物。买方的相应期望是,所支付的货物将及时交付,并将代表。虽然这很少被视为安全问题,而且通常以保护消费者的名义进行,但对安全问题的广泛分析必须考虑到消费者的需求。双方也可能有一些无关紧要的问题,特别是交易的隐私和参与者的匿名性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信