IORapp: An R tool for Inter-Observer Reliability Assessment of Time and Motion data

Stefano Guidi, M. Tanzini, Johanna I. Westbrook
{"title":"IORapp: An R tool for Inter-Observer Reliability Assessment of Time and Motion data","authors":"Stefano Guidi, M. Tanzini, Johanna I. Westbrook","doi":"10.1145/3452853.3452890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct observational time and motion studies, in which one or more observers continuously observe and record an individual's activities over a certain period of time, can provide valuable insights into work and communication patterns and assist in identification of areas to intervene to support safe and effective work. These studies have increased in number and sophistication, also due to the availability of software tools for PDA to support the observers. A key methodological issue for these studies is the assessment of Inter-Observer Reliability (IOR). IOR is crucial for ensuring reliability of data collection in which multiple observers are involved. In workflow time studies the multivariate, time-stamped and ordered nature of the data limits the applicability of traditional inter-rater reliability measures, and makes this assessment challenging. Measures such as Cohen's Kappa, in fact, are only applicable to one variable at the time, so that high K scores for one aspect can be achieved even if two observers disagree substantially on other variables which are the object of their observation. Secondly, computing these measures first requires either matching pairs of datapoints from different observers viewing the same entity, a problem that cannot be done with perfect certainty, or restructuring the data into fixed-length time window sequences. No single method can address all the different aspects on which observers in time and motion studies can disagree, so one should adopt a composite method. We developed a set of functions and a Shiny app to assist this process for data collected with the Work Observation Method By Activity Timing (WOMBAT) method. The app allows the loading of data from pairs/groups of observers and computes a wide set of agreement measures on both matched data and on time window data. These measures are presented in a dashboard along with interactive visualizations of the observers’ data, and can be saved and plotted over time in a different section.","PeriodicalId":334884,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452853.3452890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct observational time and motion studies, in which one or more observers continuously observe and record an individual's activities over a certain period of time, can provide valuable insights into work and communication patterns and assist in identification of areas to intervene to support safe and effective work. These studies have increased in number and sophistication, also due to the availability of software tools for PDA to support the observers. A key methodological issue for these studies is the assessment of Inter-Observer Reliability (IOR). IOR is crucial for ensuring reliability of data collection in which multiple observers are involved. In workflow time studies the multivariate, time-stamped and ordered nature of the data limits the applicability of traditional inter-rater reliability measures, and makes this assessment challenging. Measures such as Cohen's Kappa, in fact, are only applicable to one variable at the time, so that high K scores for one aspect can be achieved even if two observers disagree substantially on other variables which are the object of their observation. Secondly, computing these measures first requires either matching pairs of datapoints from different observers viewing the same entity, a problem that cannot be done with perfect certainty, or restructuring the data into fixed-length time window sequences. No single method can address all the different aspects on which observers in time and motion studies can disagree, so one should adopt a composite method. We developed a set of functions and a Shiny app to assist this process for data collected with the Work Observation Method By Activity Timing (WOMBAT) method. The app allows the loading of data from pairs/groups of observers and computes a wide set of agreement measures on both matched data and on time window data. These measures are presented in a dashboard along with interactive visualizations of the observers’ data, and can be saved and plotted over time in a different section.
IORapp:用于时间和运动数据的观察者间可靠性评估的R工具
直接观察时间和动作研究,即一个或多个观察者在一定时间内持续观察和记录一个人的活动,可以为工作和沟通模式提供有价值的见解,并有助于确定需要干预的领域,以支持安全有效的工作。这些研究在数量和复杂程度上都有所增加,这也是由于有了PDA软件工具来支持观察员。这些研究的一个关键方法学问题是评估观察者间信度(IOR)。IOR对于确保涉及多个观察者的数据收集的可靠性至关重要。在工作流时间研究中,数据的多变量性、时间戳性和有序性限制了传统的跨等级可靠性度量的适用性,使其具有挑战性。事实上,像Cohen’s Kappa这样的测量方法在同一时间只适用于一个变量,因此即使两个观察者在他们观察的其他变量上存在重大分歧,也可以实现一个方面的高K分。其次,计算这些度量首先需要匹配来自不同观察者观察同一实体的成对数据点,这是一个无法完全确定的问题,或者将数据重组为固定长度的时间窗口序列。没有一种方法可以解决时间和运动研究中观察者可能不同意的所有不同方面,因此应该采用综合方法。我们开发了一套功能和一个Shiny的应用程序来辅助使用工作观察方法通过活动计时(WOMBAT)方法收集的数据。该应用程序允许从成对/组观察者加载数据,并计算匹配数据和时间窗口数据的广泛协议措施。这些测量与观察者数据的交互式可视化一起显示在仪表板中,并且可以在不同的部分保存和绘制随时间的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信