Surface roughness evaluation of different novel CAD/CAM dental materials

Stefan Vulović, I. Stančić, Aleksandra Popovac, Aleksandra Milić-Lemić
{"title":"Surface roughness evaluation of different novel CAD/CAM dental materials","authors":"Stefan Vulović, I. Stančić, Aleksandra Popovac, Aleksandra Milić-Lemić","doi":"10.46793/tribomat.2022.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare surface roughness among different CAD/CAM dental materials when all materials are finished and polished according to the manufacturer's instructions. The 45 specimens were split into three groups: RBC (resin-based composite), ZR (zirconia) and CoCr4 (CoCr4 alloy). The surface roughness was evaluated using a mechanical profilometer, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses. The data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with a Dunn's post hoc analysis and all data were presented as mean ± SD. Surface roughness analysis on a microscale (μm) revealed significantly higher Ra (μm) mean values in the ZR group compared to RBC and (p < 0.05) and CoCr4 group (p < 0.05), between which no statistically significant difference was observed (p > 0.05). Surface roughness analysis on a nanoscale (nm) has shown the opposite results, with the lowest values in the ZR group and statistically significant differences among all material groups (p < 0.05). AFM 3D and SEM 2D images revealed heterogeneous surface morphology for all groups.","PeriodicalId":140630,"journal":{"name":"Tribology and Materials","volume":"306 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/tribomat.2022.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare surface roughness among different CAD/CAM dental materials when all materials are finished and polished according to the manufacturer's instructions. The 45 specimens were split into three groups: RBC (resin-based composite), ZR (zirconia) and CoCr4 (CoCr4 alloy). The surface roughness was evaluated using a mechanical profilometer, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses. The data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with a Dunn's post hoc analysis and all data were presented as mean ± SD. Surface roughness analysis on a microscale (μm) revealed significantly higher Ra (μm) mean values in the ZR group compared to RBC and (p < 0.05) and CoCr4 group (p < 0.05), between which no statistically significant difference was observed (p > 0.05). Surface roughness analysis on a nanoscale (nm) has shown the opposite results, with the lowest values in the ZR group and statistically significant differences among all material groups (p < 0.05). AFM 3D and SEM 2D images revealed heterogeneous surface morphology for all groups.
不同新型CAD/CAM牙科材料的表面粗糙度评价
本研究的目的是评估和比较不同CAD/CAM牙科材料在所有材料按照制造商的说明进行加工和抛光时的表面粗糙度。将45个试样分为三组:RBC(树脂基复合材料)、ZR(氧化锆)和CoCr4 (CoCr4合金)。使用机械轮廓仪、原子力显微镜(AFM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析来评估表面粗糙度。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn事后分析对数据进行分析,所有数据均以mean±SD表示。微尺度(μm)表面粗糙度分析显示,ZR组Ra (μm)平均值显著高于RBC组(p < 0.05)和CoCr4组(p < 0.05),两组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。纳米尺度(nm)的表面粗糙度分析结果相反,ZR组的粗糙度值最低,各材料组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。AFM 3D和SEM 2D图像显示所有组的表面形貌均不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信