The Telecommuting Paradox

R. Westfall
{"title":"The Telecommuting Paradox","authors":"R. Westfall","doi":"10.1080/10580539708907070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agency and institutional theory posit that economic and social benefits aside, the demand for telecommuting remains low because of how people currently work in organizations. Recommendations based on these theories for changing the way employees are evaluated, the way they are supported by technology, and organizational use of space will help foster telecommuting's institutional legitimacy and potential to deliver benefits on individual, organizational, and societal levels.","PeriodicalId":117295,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Syst. Manag.","volume":"299 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Syst. Manag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10580539708907070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Agency and institutional theory posit that economic and social benefits aside, the demand for telecommuting remains low because of how people currently work in organizations. Recommendations based on these theories for changing the way employees are evaluated, the way they are supported by technology, and organizational use of space will help foster telecommuting's institutional legitimacy and potential to deliver benefits on individual, organizational, and societal levels.
远程办公悖论
代理和制度理论认为,撇开经济和社会利益不谈,由于人们目前在组织中的工作方式,远程办公的需求仍然很低。基于这些理论的建议将改变员工的评估方式、技术支持员工的方式以及组织对空间的利用,这将有助于促进远程办公在制度上的合法性,并在个人、组织和社会层面上带来好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信