Working Paper 1: Anti-money laundering

G. Aiolfi, M. Pieth
{"title":"Working Paper 1: Anti-money laundering","authors":"G. Aiolfi, M. Pieth","doi":"10.12685/bigwp.2012.1.1-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Switzerland is frequently accused of being reluctant to take thorough measures to fight money laundering. Both the Swiss authorities and the banks in Switzerland strongly reject such accusations. We are convinced that our anti-money laundering measures are best market practice. \nWhat are the reasons for these markedly different viewpoints? Can they be explained by conceptual differences? Are the negative statements the result of insufficient knowledge of our legal provisions, or are they simply motivated by the political desire of the respective commentators to divert public attention from the deficient anti-money laundering policies in their own countries? \nA comparison of our measures with the most important competing financial centres could help to answer these questions. The SFS Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz – a foundation initiated by the foreign banks in Switzerland – commissioned Professor Mark Pieth of the Basel Institute on Governance to conduct a comparative study of anti-money laundering regulations in the UK, the US and Singapore, the three financial centres which closely compete with the Swiss private banking sector. Professor Pieth is a renowned expert in the field and has close contacts with the international experts who also contributed to the project with in-depth country studies.","PeriodicalId":447485,"journal":{"name":"Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12685/bigwp.2012.1.1-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Switzerland is frequently accused of being reluctant to take thorough measures to fight money laundering. Both the Swiss authorities and the banks in Switzerland strongly reject such accusations. We are convinced that our anti-money laundering measures are best market practice. What are the reasons for these markedly different viewpoints? Can they be explained by conceptual differences? Are the negative statements the result of insufficient knowledge of our legal provisions, or are they simply motivated by the political desire of the respective commentators to divert public attention from the deficient anti-money laundering policies in their own countries? A comparison of our measures with the most important competing financial centres could help to answer these questions. The SFS Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz – a foundation initiated by the foreign banks in Switzerland – commissioned Professor Mark Pieth of the Basel Institute on Governance to conduct a comparative study of anti-money laundering regulations in the UK, the US and Singapore, the three financial centres which closely compete with the Swiss private banking sector. Professor Pieth is a renowned expert in the field and has close contacts with the international experts who also contributed to the project with in-depth country studies.
工作文件1:反洗钱
瑞士经常被指责不愿采取彻底措施打击洗钱。瑞士当局和瑞士的银行都强烈否认这种指控。我们深信,我们的反洗黑钱措施是最佳的市场做法。这些明显不同的观点的原因是什么?它们可以用概念上的差异来解释吗?这些负面言论是对我们的法律条文了解不足的结果,还是仅仅是出于各自评论员的政治愿望,以转移公众对其本国反洗钱政策不足的注意力?将我们的措施与最重要的竞争金融中心进行比较,可以帮助回答这些问题。瑞士金融广场基金会(SFS Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz)是一个由在瑞士的外国银行发起的基金会,它委托巴塞尔管治研究所的Mark Pieth教授对英国、美国和新加坡这三个与瑞士私人银行业密切竞争的金融中心的反洗钱法规进行比较研究。Pieth教授是该领域的知名专家,与国际专家保持密切联系,这些专家也通过深入的国别研究对该项目作出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信