“The Dick Is Probably a Bit Overrated”

J. Andreasson, Thomas Johansson, Carina Danemalm-Jägervall
{"title":"“The Dick Is Probably a Bit Overrated”","authors":"J. Andreasson, Thomas Johansson, Carina Danemalm-Jägervall","doi":"10.3167/jbsm.2023.of80822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine how healthcare professionals (HCPs) \nunderstand the impact prostate cancer treatment can have on patients’ sense of masculinity, sexuality, and intimate life, and how they describe such issues are communicated with patients. Theoretically, HCP narratives are interpreted as part of a reflective process in which notions of hegemonic masculinity are communicated, and sometimes rethought and redefined, within the rehabilitation process. The study showed that HCPs sometimes felt unqualified to deal with issues concerning masculinity and sexuality as such topics were understood to be partially outside the medical domain of their professions. Nonetheless, HCPs engaged in such conversations with patients and described how they tried to support them in reorientating their sense of masculinity. The article concludes that, whereas HCPs tended to describe their patients’ responses to rehabilitation from an embodied and psychological perspective, their own professional and personal views on masculinity usually departed from a sociocultural level (focusing on what it means to be a man in contemporary Swedish society, suggesting that penetrative sex is overrated), where ongoing configurations of hegemonic masculinity were more evident.","PeriodicalId":166761,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bodies, Sexualities, and Masculinities","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bodies, Sexualities, and Masculinities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/jbsm.2023.of80822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine how healthcare professionals (HCPs) understand the impact prostate cancer treatment can have on patients’ sense of masculinity, sexuality, and intimate life, and how they describe such issues are communicated with patients. Theoretically, HCP narratives are interpreted as part of a reflective process in which notions of hegemonic masculinity are communicated, and sometimes rethought and redefined, within the rehabilitation process. The study showed that HCPs sometimes felt unqualified to deal with issues concerning masculinity and sexuality as such topics were understood to be partially outside the medical domain of their professions. Nonetheless, HCPs engaged in such conversations with patients and described how they tried to support them in reorientating their sense of masculinity. The article concludes that, whereas HCPs tended to describe their patients’ responses to rehabilitation from an embodied and psychological perspective, their own professional and personal views on masculinity usually departed from a sociocultural level (focusing on what it means to be a man in contemporary Swedish society, suggesting that penetrative sex is overrated), where ongoing configurations of hegemonic masculinity were more evident.
“迪克可能被高估了一点”
本研究旨在探讨医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)如何理解前列腺癌治疗对患者阳刚之气、性行为和亲密生活的影响,以及他们如何与患者沟通这些问题。从理论上讲,HCP叙事被解释为反思过程的一部分,在这个过程中,霸权男子气概的概念被传达,有时在康复过程中被重新思考和重新定义。研究表明,医护人员有时觉得自己没有资格处理与男性气质和性有关的问题,因为这些话题被认为部分超出了他们专业的医学领域。尽管如此,HCPs还是与患者进行了这样的对话,并描述了他们如何试图支持他们重新定位他们的男子气概。这篇文章的结论是,尽管HCPs倾向于从身体和心理的角度来描述他们的病人对康复的反应,但他们自己的专业和个人对男子气概的看法通常偏离了社会文化层面(关注在当代瑞典社会中作为一个男人意味着什么,这表明插入式性行为被高估了),在那里,霸权男子气概的持续配置更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信