Evaluation Of Postoperative Pain After Using Sonic Vibringe Irrigation System Versus Conventional syringe irrigation In Single Rooted Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis : A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial

Sara Ahmed, Heba Elfar, Sherief El Khodary
{"title":"Evaluation Of Postoperative Pain After Using Sonic Vibringe Irrigation System Versus Conventional syringe irrigation In Single Rooted Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis : A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial","authors":"Sara Ahmed, Heba Elfar, Sherief El Khodary","doi":"10.21608/adjc.2019.17020.1031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to clinically compare the postoperative pain after Vibringe sonic irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation during root canal treatment in single-rooted teeth . Methods: A total of 18 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in need of nonsurgical endodontic retreatment were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 9) . Patients were carefully diagnosed and checked for the eligibility criteria . Irrigation in (group A) was delivered and sonically activated by Vibringe and Irrigation in (group B) was done using conventional needle. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment according to the NRS where; 0; No pain, 1-3; mild pain, 4-6; moderate pain, 7-10; severe pain “severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain”. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U,Friedman’s test, and Fisher’s Exact tests. Results: Postoperative pain was non significantly different in the Vibringe group in comparison with the conventional needle group (P >.05) on all time intervals “ 6 -12-24 and 48 hours” (P-value = 0.753) . Pain scores from base line to 6 hours post-operatively showed statistically significant decrease in both Vibringe and Conventional needle irrigation group (P-value <0.001). Conclusions: The sonically activated Vibringe irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation are equally safe with low incidence of post-operative at 6, 12 , 24 and 48 hours intervals.","PeriodicalId":140501,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Dental Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjc.2019.17020.1031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to clinically compare the postoperative pain after Vibringe sonic irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation during root canal treatment in single-rooted teeth . Methods: A total of 18 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in need of nonsurgical endodontic retreatment were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 9) . Patients were carefully diagnosed and checked for the eligibility criteria . Irrigation in (group A) was delivered and sonically activated by Vibringe and Irrigation in (group B) was done using conventional needle. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment according to the NRS where; 0; No pain, 1-3; mild pain, 4-6; moderate pain, 7-10; severe pain “severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain”. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U,Friedman’s test, and Fisher’s Exact tests. Results: Postoperative pain was non significantly different in the Vibringe group in comparison with the conventional needle group (P >.05) on all time intervals “ 6 -12-24 and 48 hours” (P-value = 0.753) . Pain scores from base line to 6 hours post-operatively showed statistically significant decrease in both Vibringe and Conventional needle irrigation group (P-value <0.001). Conclusions: The sonically activated Vibringe irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation are equally safe with low incidence of post-operative at 6, 12 , 24 and 48 hours intervals.
对症状不可逆牙髓炎单根牙行超声振动冲洗与常规注射器冲洗术后疼痛的评价:一项随机临床对照试验
目的:本研究的目的是临床比较在单根牙根管治疗中,使用Vibringe超声冲洗系统和传统针冲洗系统后的疼痛。方法:将18例需要非手术再治疗的症状性不可逆性牙髓炎患者随机分为2组(n = 9)。仔细诊断并检查患者的资格标准。A组用振动针进行冲洗,B组用常规针进行冲洗。根据NRS评估治疗后6、12、24和48小时的术后疼痛情况,其中;0;无痛,1-3;轻度疼痛,4-6;中度疼痛,7-10分;剧烈疼痛“剧烈疼痛,止痛剂对缓解疼痛没有作用”。使用Mann-Whitney U、Friedman检验和Fisher精确检验分析数据。结果:在6 ~ 12 ~ 24、48小时的时间间隔内,Vibringe组术后疼痛与常规针刺组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05) (P值= 0.753)。从基线到术后6小时,振动针组和常规针冲洗组的疼痛评分均有统计学意义(p值<0.001)。结论:超声激活振动冲洗系统与传统针刺冲洗系统在术后间隔6、12、24、48 h的发生率低,安全性相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信