The roles of sketching in design: Mapping the tension between functions in design sketches

Peter Vistisen
{"title":"The roles of sketching in design: Mapping the tension between functions in design sketches","authors":"Peter Vistisen","doi":"10.21606/nordes.2015.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines how the role of sketching in design process has been disseminated previously through a review of prior perspectives into the field. We identify that the studies of design sketching has been dominated by two perspectives: studies into what is known as ‘visual thinking’ (Goldschmidt 1991, Schon & Wiggins 1992, Tversky et al. 1999), which examines the designers reflective conversation with the sketch, and a second perspective on sketching as way of ‘visual communication’ with others in the design process (Lugt 2005, Schutze 2003, Buxton 2010). We raise the question of whether it is reasonable to combine the two different roles of sketching to form a more intertwined relationship - seeing the two as sides of the same coin. Based on the terminology of Olofsson & Sjoflen (2005) four functions are identified as being representative for the different roles sketching can take in the design process: investigative, explorative, communicative, and persuasive. We appropriate these categories into a tension field, reflecting how the role of the same sketch may change over the course of time in the design project, based upon the type of knowledge required to gain from the sketch at a given time.","PeriodicalId":214261,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Design Research Conference","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Design Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2015.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper examines how the role of sketching in design process has been disseminated previously through a review of prior perspectives into the field. We identify that the studies of design sketching has been dominated by two perspectives: studies into what is known as ‘visual thinking’ (Goldschmidt 1991, Schon & Wiggins 1992, Tversky et al. 1999), which examines the designers reflective conversation with the sketch, and a second perspective on sketching as way of ‘visual communication’ with others in the design process (Lugt 2005, Schutze 2003, Buxton 2010). We raise the question of whether it is reasonable to combine the two different roles of sketching to form a more intertwined relationship - seeing the two as sides of the same coin. Based on the terminology of Olofsson & Sjoflen (2005) four functions are identified as being representative for the different roles sketching can take in the design process: investigative, explorative, communicative, and persuasive. We appropriate these categories into a tension field, reflecting how the role of the same sketch may change over the course of time in the design project, based upon the type of knowledge required to gain from the sketch at a given time.
草图在设计中的作用:在设计草图中映射功能之间的张力
本文考察了素描在设计过程中的作用是如何通过对该领域先前观点的回顾而传播的。我们发现,设计草图的研究主要由两种观点主导:一种是对所谓“视觉思维”的研究(Goldschmidt 1991, Schon & Wiggins 1992, Tversky et al. 1999),它研究了设计师与草图的反思对话,另一种是将草图作为设计过程中与他人“视觉交流”的方式(Lugt 2005, Schutze 2003, Buxton 2010)。我们提出的问题是,将素描的两种不同角色结合起来,形成一种更加交织在一起的关系,是否合理——将两者视为同一枚硬币的两面。根据Olofsson & Sjoflen(2005)的术语,素描在设计过程中可以发挥四种不同的作用:调查性、探索性、沟通性和说服力。我们将这些类别纳入一个张力场,反映出同一草图在设计项目中的作用如何随着时间的推移而变化,这取决于在给定时间内从草图中获得的知识类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信