{"title":"Why partial design verification works better than it should","authors":"J. Savir","doi":"10.1109/DAC.1988.14846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of verifying the correctness of a combinatorial design is known to be NP-complete. Nevertheless, most products reaching the consumer are functionally correct. The author attempts to explain this phenomenon by considering the effort of going through a less-than-perfect design-verification process and then explains why many design errors are relatively easily caught.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":230716,"journal":{"name":"25th ACM/IEEE, Design Automation Conference.Proceedings 1988.","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"25th ACM/IEEE, Design Automation Conference.Proceedings 1988.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DAC.1988.14846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The problem of verifying the correctness of a combinatorial design is known to be NP-complete. Nevertheless, most products reaching the consumer are functionally correct. The author attempts to explain this phenomenon by considering the effort of going through a less-than-perfect design-verification process and then explains why many design errors are relatively easily caught.<>