Geo-referenced proximity detection of wildlife with WildScope: design and characterization

G. Picco, D. Molteni, A. Murphy, F. Ossi, F. Cagnacci, M. Corrà, S. Nicoloso
{"title":"Geo-referenced proximity detection of wildlife with WildScope: design and characterization","authors":"G. Picco, D. Molteni, A. Murphy, F. Ossi, F. Cagnacci, M. Corrà, S. Nicoloso","doi":"10.1145/2737095.2737103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing systems for wildlife monitoring focus either on acquiring the location of animals via GPS or detecting their proximity via wireless communication; the integration of the two, remarkably increasing the biological value of the data gathered, is hitherto unexplored. We offer this integration as our first contribution, embodied by our WildScope system whose key functionality is geo-referenced proximity detection of an animal to others or to landmarks. However, to be truly useful to biologists, the in-field monitoring system must be complemented by two key elements, largely neglected by the literature and constituting our other contributions: i) a model exposing the tradeoffs between accuracy and lifetime, enabling biologists to determine the configuration best suited to their needs, a task complicated by the rich set of on-board devices (GPS, low-power radio, GSM modem) whose activation depends strongly on the biological questions and target species at hand; ii) a validation in controlled experiments that, by eliciting the relationship between proximity detection, the distance at which it reliably occurs, and the location acquisition, provides the cornerstone for the biologists' analysis of wildlife behavior. We test WildScope in real-world experimental setups and deployments with different degrees of control, ascertaining the platform accuracy w.r.t. ground truth and comparing against a commercial proximity logger.","PeriodicalId":318992,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2737095.2737103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Existing systems for wildlife monitoring focus either on acquiring the location of animals via GPS or detecting their proximity via wireless communication; the integration of the two, remarkably increasing the biological value of the data gathered, is hitherto unexplored. We offer this integration as our first contribution, embodied by our WildScope system whose key functionality is geo-referenced proximity detection of an animal to others or to landmarks. However, to be truly useful to biologists, the in-field monitoring system must be complemented by two key elements, largely neglected by the literature and constituting our other contributions: i) a model exposing the tradeoffs between accuracy and lifetime, enabling biologists to determine the configuration best suited to their needs, a task complicated by the rich set of on-board devices (GPS, low-power radio, GSM modem) whose activation depends strongly on the biological questions and target species at hand; ii) a validation in controlled experiments that, by eliciting the relationship between proximity detection, the distance at which it reliably occurs, and the location acquisition, provides the cornerstone for the biologists' analysis of wildlife behavior. We test WildScope in real-world experimental setups and deployments with different degrees of control, ascertaining the platform accuracy w.r.t. ground truth and comparing against a commercial proximity logger.
野生动物的地理参考接近检测与WildScope:设计和表征
现有的野生动物监测系统侧重于通过GPS获取动物的位置或通过无线通信检测它们的距离;将两者结合起来,显著提高所收集数据的生物学价值,迄今尚未得到探索。我们提供这种集成作为我们的第一个贡献,体现在我们的WildScope系统,其关键功能是地理参考接近检测动物到其他动物或地标。然而,要真正对生物学家有用,实地监测系统必须有两个关键要素加以补充,这两个要素在很大程度上被文献所忽视,并构成我们的其他贡献:i)一个揭示准确性和寿命之间权衡的模型,使生物学家能够确定最适合他们需要的配置,这一任务因丰富的机载设备(GPS、低功率无线电、GSM调制解调器)而变得复杂,这些设备的激活在很大程度上取决于生物学问题和手头的目标物种;Ii)在对照实验中验证,通过引出接近检测、可靠发生的距离和位置获取之间的关系,为生物学家分析野生动物行为提供了基础。我们在实际的实验设置和部署中对WildScope进行了不同程度的控制,以确定平台的精度,并与商用接近度记录仪进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信