On passive inference attacks against physical-layer key extraction?

Matthew Edman, A. Kiayias, B. Yener
{"title":"On passive inference attacks against physical-layer key extraction?","authors":"Matthew Edman, A. Kiayias, B. Yener","doi":"10.1145/1972551.1972559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical-layer key extraction techniques attempt to derive a shared symmetric cryptographic key between two wireless devices based on the principle of channel reciprocity, which states that the signal envelope between two communicating devices is strongly correlated. A key security assumption made in previous literature is that the signal envelope observed by an adversary located greater than a half-wavelength away is uncorrelated with that shared between the two communicating devices; however, this assumption has yet to be rigorously evaluated in previous work on physical-layer key extraction. In this paper, we present an experimental analysis that examines the relationship between the channel measurements used to extract a symmetric key between two devices and those observed by one or more distantly located passive adversaries. We find that, contrary to previous assumptions, there does exist a strong correlation in measurements observed by adversaries located significantly greater than a half-wavelength away from two communicating wireless devices. Further, we provide initial results that show the extent to which the adversary is able to leverage such correlations to infer portions of the key extracted between two devices using previously published physical-layer key extraction techniques.","PeriodicalId":302603,"journal":{"name":"European Workshop on System Security","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Workshop on System Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1972551.1972559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

Physical-layer key extraction techniques attempt to derive a shared symmetric cryptographic key between two wireless devices based on the principle of channel reciprocity, which states that the signal envelope between two communicating devices is strongly correlated. A key security assumption made in previous literature is that the signal envelope observed by an adversary located greater than a half-wavelength away is uncorrelated with that shared between the two communicating devices; however, this assumption has yet to be rigorously evaluated in previous work on physical-layer key extraction. In this paper, we present an experimental analysis that examines the relationship between the channel measurements used to extract a symmetric key between two devices and those observed by one or more distantly located passive adversaries. We find that, contrary to previous assumptions, there does exist a strong correlation in measurements observed by adversaries located significantly greater than a half-wavelength away from two communicating wireless devices. Further, we provide initial results that show the extent to which the adversary is able to leverage such correlations to infer portions of the key extracted between two devices using previously published physical-layer key extraction techniques.
针对物理层密钥提取的被动推理攻击?
物理层密钥提取技术试图基于信道互反原理在两个无线设备之间推导共享的对称加密密钥,这表明两个通信设备之间的信号包络是强相关的。在以前的文献中做出的一个关键的安全假设是,位于大于半波长距离的对手观察到的信号包络与两个通信设备之间共享的信号包络不相关;然而,这一假设尚未在先前的物理层密钥提取工作中得到严格的评估。在本文中,我们提出了一个实验分析,研究了用于提取两个设备之间对称密钥的通道测量与一个或多个远程被动对手观察到的通道测量之间的关系。我们发现,与之前的假设相反,在距离两个通信无线设备明显大于半波长的对手观察到的测量结果中确实存在很强的相关性。此外,我们提供了初步结果,显示攻击者能够利用这种相关性来推断使用先前发布的物理层密钥提取技术在两个设备之间提取的密钥部分的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信