How does didactic knowledge develop?: Experiences from a design project

P. E. Sloane
{"title":"How does didactic knowledge develop?: Experiences from a design project","authors":"P. E. Sloane","doi":"10.15460/EDER.5.1.1511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"knowledge is created in DBR projects, a partly methodological approach. The other author attempts to find theoretical points of reference and reassurances about the project work. This leads to very practical considerations. The project did not commence with an exactly defined problem; we began with broad concerns that had to be distilled into specific goals over the course of the project. We had to conduct dialogical planning in our different roles and responsibilities. After each work phase and workshop, we reviewed and made a record of what had happened and how, the condition of the group and what it should work on in the next practical phase. This was supplemented with classroom visits and one-on-one discussions with various project participants. The information derived from these evaluations was subsequently used in the planning of the next cycle. Therefore, in the next cycle, the same project was not conducted, but a revised project was developed, which continued from where the previous cycle had ended. Thus, the problem definition continued evolving. In this paper, we have tried to concisely present how the work progressed in phases and cycles and roughly described the thought process and evaluations that shaped this project. Perceived this way, this paper serves two different interests. First, it shows how a problem definition was developed and further sharpened and what concrete result was obtained in the process. This is indicated by the subtitle. Second, it explains how knowledge is created and defines the scope and specificity of this knowledge. In many passages, the text refers to special features of German VET and VET research. In order to ensure that readers who are not so familiar with these issues can understand the background, we have introduced grey boxes containing background information. Readers who do not need this information and want to follow the argumentation in a target-aimed way have the opportunity to skip these text passages. Implementation of a curriculum Knowledge production in design processes Cooperation in design-projects Design projects in vocational colleges Didactics as applied theory","PeriodicalId":145708,"journal":{"name":"EDeR. Educational Design Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDeR. Educational Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15460/EDER.5.1.1511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

knowledge is created in DBR projects, a partly methodological approach. The other author attempts to find theoretical points of reference and reassurances about the project work. This leads to very practical considerations. The project did not commence with an exactly defined problem; we began with broad concerns that had to be distilled into specific goals over the course of the project. We had to conduct dialogical planning in our different roles and responsibilities. After each work phase and workshop, we reviewed and made a record of what had happened and how, the condition of the group and what it should work on in the next practical phase. This was supplemented with classroom visits and one-on-one discussions with various project participants. The information derived from these evaluations was subsequently used in the planning of the next cycle. Therefore, in the next cycle, the same project was not conducted, but a revised project was developed, which continued from where the previous cycle had ended. Thus, the problem definition continued evolving. In this paper, we have tried to concisely present how the work progressed in phases and cycles and roughly described the thought process and evaluations that shaped this project. Perceived this way, this paper serves two different interests. First, it shows how a problem definition was developed and further sharpened and what concrete result was obtained in the process. This is indicated by the subtitle. Second, it explains how knowledge is created and defines the scope and specificity of this knowledge. In many passages, the text refers to special features of German VET and VET research. In order to ensure that readers who are not so familiar with these issues can understand the background, we have introduced grey boxes containing background information. Readers who do not need this information and want to follow the argumentation in a target-aimed way have the opportunity to skip these text passages. Implementation of a curriculum Knowledge production in design processes Cooperation in design-projects Design projects in vocational colleges Didactics as applied theory
教学知识是如何发展的?设计项目的经验
知识是在DBR项目中创造的,这是一种部分方法论的方法。另一位作者试图为项目工作寻找理论参考点和保证。这导致了非常实际的考虑。这个项目并没有从一个明确定义的问题开始;我们从广泛的关注开始,这些关注必须在项目过程中被提炼成具体的目标。我们必须在不同的角色和责任中进行对话规划。在每个工作阶段和工作坊结束后,我们回顾并记录了已经发生的事情和如何发生的事情,小组的情况以及下一个实际阶段应该做什么。辅以课堂参观和与不同项目参与者的一对一讨论。从这些评价中得到的资料后来用于规划下一个周期。因此,在下一个周期中,不再进行同样的项目,而是制定一个订正的项目,从上一个周期结束的地方继续进行。因此,问题定义继续演变。在本文中,我们试图简明地呈现工作是如何在阶段和周期中进行的,并粗略地描述了形成这个项目的思维过程和评估。从这个角度看,本文服务于两种不同的利益。首先,它展示了一个问题的定义是如何发展和进一步细化的,以及在这个过程中获得了什么具体的结果。这是由副标题表明的。其次,它解释了知识是如何产生的,并定义了知识的范围和特殊性。在许多段落中,本文提到了德国职业教育和职业教育研究的特点。为了保证对这些问题不太熟悉的读者也能了解背景,我们引入了包含背景信息的灰框。读者不需要这些信息,并希望以有针对性的方式跟随论证,有机会跳过这些文本段落。课程的实施设计过程中的知识生产设计项目的合作高职院校设计项目教学应用理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信