Single dorsal incision approach for plate fixation of radius ulna midshaft fracture; interesting case report

A. Mane, Neel Kamal Sourav, Ankit B Waghela, Vijay M. Panchnadikar
{"title":"Single dorsal incision approach for plate fixation of radius ulna midshaft fracture; interesting case report","authors":"A. Mane, Neel Kamal Sourav, Ankit B Waghela, Vijay M. Panchnadikar","doi":"10.18231/j.ijos.2023.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radius and ulna shaft fractures, also known as both bone forearm fractures, are common fractures caused due to direct or indirect trauma. Open reduction and internal fixation with plating by two separate incisions is a standard and widely accepted mode of fixation. We report a case where we approached the fracture with a single dorsal incision. An eighty years old female had fractures of both radius and ulna shaft with Gustilo Anderson type two open injury. We managed the patient with single-stage debridement, open reduction, and dynamic compression plate (DCP) fixation of both bones with a single dorsal curvilinear incision and followed up postoperatively for one year. At the end of the last follow-up, the patient had no pain with a full range of movement. There were no wound-related issues. Radiologically complete union occurred without complications mentioned in the literature, such as synostosis.: We found that under specific circumstances such as open injury where two separate incisions for radius and ulna are inappropriate, a single dorsal curvilinear incision for radius and Ulna midshaft fractures is a safe and effective alternative method.","PeriodicalId":407871,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijos.2023.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radius and ulna shaft fractures, also known as both bone forearm fractures, are common fractures caused due to direct or indirect trauma. Open reduction and internal fixation with plating by two separate incisions is a standard and widely accepted mode of fixation. We report a case where we approached the fracture with a single dorsal incision. An eighty years old female had fractures of both radius and ulna shaft with Gustilo Anderson type two open injury. We managed the patient with single-stage debridement, open reduction, and dynamic compression plate (DCP) fixation of both bones with a single dorsal curvilinear incision and followed up postoperatively for one year. At the end of the last follow-up, the patient had no pain with a full range of movement. There were no wound-related issues. Radiologically complete union occurred without complications mentioned in the literature, such as synostosis.: We found that under specific circumstances such as open injury where two separate incisions for radius and ulna are inappropriate, a single dorsal curvilinear incision for radius and Ulna midshaft fractures is a safe and effective alternative method.
单背切口入路治疗桡骨尺骨中轴骨折钢板固定有趣的病例报告
桡骨和尺骨干骨折又称双骨前臂骨折,是由直接或间接外伤引起的常见骨折。通过两个独立的切口切开复位和钢板内固定是一种标准和广泛接受的固定方式。我们报告一个病例,我们接近骨折与一个单一的背部切口。一位80岁的女性,桡骨和尺骨干骨折合并Gustilo Anderson 2型开放性损伤。我们对患者进行一期清创、切开复位、双骨动态加压钢板(DCP)单侧弯曲切口固定,术后随访1年。在最后一次随访结束时,患者无疼痛,活动范围全。没有与伤口有关的问题。放射学上完全愈合,无文献中提到的并发症,如结膜紧闭。我们发现,在开放性损伤不适合桡骨和尺骨分开切开的特定情况下,桡骨和尺骨中轴骨折采用单背曲线切口是一种安全有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信