A qualitative and quantitative assessment method for software process model

Xiong Biyang, Jin Min
{"title":"A qualitative and quantitative assessment method for software process model","authors":"Xiong Biyang, Jin Min","doi":"10.1109/ICSESS.2010.5552434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aimed at the problems of high-cost, non-completeness and ambiguity existed in the traditional assessment methods for Software Process Model (SPM), this paper proposes a qualitative and quantitative assessment method. On the basis of assessment theory and domain experience of SPM, the unclear goals in the project start-up phase are qualitatively described in the form of problem set and expert problem domain is constructed as the assessment criteria on the implementation capability of SPM in the proposed method. With the integration of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis by using a multi-index synthetic assessment algorithm of AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), the weight vector of goals and the reciprocal comparative matrix of problem domain are calculated and then the assessment result in dimensionless index is obtained. In order to reduce the cost of assessment, questionnaires instead of project tracking and audit are adopted to extract project goals in the method. Meanwhile, SPM is comprehensively assessed from four aspects including personnel, method, product and process, and the assessment result can intuitively reflect the capability of different SPM in a numerical form. Finally, an example of how to assess and choose four classical SPMs in the initial stage of a practical project is given out to show the validity of this assessment method.","PeriodicalId":264630,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Sciences","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2010.5552434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aimed at the problems of high-cost, non-completeness and ambiguity existed in the traditional assessment methods for Software Process Model (SPM), this paper proposes a qualitative and quantitative assessment method. On the basis of assessment theory and domain experience of SPM, the unclear goals in the project start-up phase are qualitatively described in the form of problem set and expert problem domain is constructed as the assessment criteria on the implementation capability of SPM in the proposed method. With the integration of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis by using a multi-index synthetic assessment algorithm of AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), the weight vector of goals and the reciprocal comparative matrix of problem domain are calculated and then the assessment result in dimensionless index is obtained. In order to reduce the cost of assessment, questionnaires instead of project tracking and audit are adopted to extract project goals in the method. Meanwhile, SPM is comprehensively assessed from four aspects including personnel, method, product and process, and the assessment result can intuitively reflect the capability of different SPM in a numerical form. Finally, an example of how to assess and choose four classical SPMs in the initial stage of a practical project is given out to show the validity of this assessment method.
一种软件过程模型的定性和定量评价方法
针对软件过程模型(SPM)传统评估方法存在的成本高、不完备和模糊性等问题,提出了一种定性和定量相结合的评估方法。基于SPM的评估理论和领域经验,以问题集的形式对项目启动阶段的不明确目标进行定性描述,并构建专家问题域作为评估SPM实施能力的标准。采用层次分析法(AHP)的多指标综合评价算法,将定性分析与定量分析相结合,计算目标的权重向量和问题域的互反比较矩阵,从而得到无量纲指标下的评价结果。为了降低评估成本,该方法采用问卷调查代替项目跟踪和审计来提取项目目标。同时,从人员、方法、产品和过程四个方面对SPM进行综合评价,评价结果可以直观地以数值形式反映不同SPM的能力。最后,以实际工程初始阶段对四种典型项目管理机制的评价和选择为例,说明了该评价方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信