Assessment of research methodology concepts through critical appraisal among undergraduate medical students and their perception: A single center study

M. Bhatti, S. Naseem, I. Din, Z. Naeem, R. N. Ahmad
{"title":"Assessment of research methodology concepts through critical appraisal among undergraduate medical students and their perception: A single center study","authors":"M. Bhatti, S. Naseem, I. Din, Z. Naeem, R. N. Ahmad","doi":"10.32593/jstmu/vol2.iss1.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Evidence based medicine is an interplay of individual clinical acumen and best available evidence through scientific systematic research. With the advent of modern medicine in the last two centuries, medical education has seen and continues to experience its revolutionary effects. An important aspect in this regard is the integration of biomedical research. \nObjectives: To assess the research skills among undergraduate medical students exposed to the teaching of research longitudinally through all the five academic years. \nMethodology: A mixed method study was conducted in which third year MBBS students were assessed in a group through power point presentation regarding different concepts of research while critically appraising a research article. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated, as well as thematic analysis was done. \nResults: From a total of 102 participants, 58 were male and 42 were female. Majority of the participants (81.4%) achieved an average or a good score and only 18.6% achieved a poor score. Six themes were generated. General enthusiasm about the activity was noted among participants who considered it beneficial. However, only a few were in the favor of incorporating this activity as a mandatory component in undergraduate studies. \nConclusion: Incorporating research in a mandatory longitudinal theme component as part of undergraduate medical studies seems a potential method of laying the foundation for future physician scientists.","PeriodicalId":302306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32593/jstmu/vol2.iss1.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence based medicine is an interplay of individual clinical acumen and best available evidence through scientific systematic research. With the advent of modern medicine in the last two centuries, medical education has seen and continues to experience its revolutionary effects. An important aspect in this regard is the integration of biomedical research. Objectives: To assess the research skills among undergraduate medical students exposed to the teaching of research longitudinally through all the five academic years. Methodology: A mixed method study was conducted in which third year MBBS students were assessed in a group through power point presentation regarding different concepts of research while critically appraising a research article. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated, as well as thematic analysis was done. Results: From a total of 102 participants, 58 were male and 42 were female. Majority of the participants (81.4%) achieved an average or a good score and only 18.6% achieved a poor score. Six themes were generated. General enthusiasm about the activity was noted among participants who considered it beneficial. However, only a few were in the favor of incorporating this activity as a mandatory component in undergraduate studies. Conclusion: Incorporating research in a mandatory longitudinal theme component as part of undergraduate medical studies seems a potential method of laying the foundation for future physician scientists.
透过批判性评价评估医学生的研究方法论概念及其认知:一项单中心研究
简介:循证医学是个体临床敏锐度和通过科学系统研究获得的最佳证据的相互作用。在过去的两个世纪里,随着现代医学的出现,医学教育已经看到并将继续经历其革命性的影响。这方面的一个重要方面是生物医学研究的整合。目的:对五学年纵向研究性教学医科本科生的研究技能进行评估。方法:进行了一项混合方法研究,其中三年级MBBS学生在批判性评价一篇研究文章的同时,通过幻灯片展示对不同研究概念的小组进行评估。收集定量和定性数据。进行描述性统计,并进行专题分析。结果:102名参与者中,男性58名,女性42名。大多数参与者(81.4%)取得了平均或良好的成绩,只有18.6%的人取得了较差的成绩。共产生了六个主题。参与者普遍对这项活动充满热情,认为它有益。然而,只有少数人赞成将这项活动作为本科学习的强制性组成部分。结论:将研究纳入强制性的纵向主题组成部分,作为本科医学研究的一部分,似乎是为未来的医师科学家奠定基础的潜在方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信