Comparison of mobile robot positioning techniques

Yulia Yamnenko, V. O. Osokin
{"title":"Comparison of mobile robot positioning techniques","authors":"Yulia Yamnenko, V. O. Osokin","doi":"10.15222/tkea2021.5-6.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article compares the accuracy of mobile robot positioning by the technique based on genetic algorithms, which are related to artificial intelligence, and by the trilateration technique. The authors consider the application of appropriate terminology borrowed from genetics and data processing algorithms for this technical problem. When using the genetic algorithm, the coordinates of the robot are found using angular methods or rigid logic methods, which are not particularly effective because of the large amount of data that is not needed for positioning, so there is a need to select the most likely indicators to find the best route to the target. \nThe genetic algorithm used in this study first selects the data by a certain criterion to enter the first population, and then the data falls into the beginning of the genetic algorithm. Each individual has chromosomes that represent a sequence of data, i.e., genes. After a chromosome is coded, the following genetic operations are performed: crossing over and mutation. These operations occur cyclically until a population with high fitness is found. The solution is a sequence of selected coordinates, from which a system is constructed to determine the optimal route to the destination. \nThe robot navigation techniques are compared in terms of coordinate positioning accuracy. Calculation results on dispersion and absolute positioning error show that the positioning using genetic algorithm gives less error than the one using trilateration method. The genetic algorithm allows finding the optimal solution of the positioning problem while reducing a significant influence of the measurement error of sensors and other measuring devices on the result.","PeriodicalId":231412,"journal":{"name":"Технология и конструирование в электронной аппаратуре","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Технология и конструирование в электронной аппаратуре","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15222/tkea2021.5-6.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article compares the accuracy of mobile robot positioning by the technique based on genetic algorithms, which are related to artificial intelligence, and by the trilateration technique. The authors consider the application of appropriate terminology borrowed from genetics and data processing algorithms for this technical problem. When using the genetic algorithm, the coordinates of the robot are found using angular methods or rigid logic methods, which are not particularly effective because of the large amount of data that is not needed for positioning, so there is a need to select the most likely indicators to find the best route to the target. The genetic algorithm used in this study first selects the data by a certain criterion to enter the first population, and then the data falls into the beginning of the genetic algorithm. Each individual has chromosomes that represent a sequence of data, i.e., genes. After a chromosome is coded, the following genetic operations are performed: crossing over and mutation. These operations occur cyclically until a population with high fitness is found. The solution is a sequence of selected coordinates, from which a system is constructed to determine the optimal route to the destination. The robot navigation techniques are compared in terms of coordinate positioning accuracy. Calculation results on dispersion and absolute positioning error show that the positioning using genetic algorithm gives less error than the one using trilateration method. The genetic algorithm allows finding the optimal solution of the positioning problem while reducing a significant influence of the measurement error of sensors and other measuring devices on the result.
移动机器人定位技术的比较
本文比较了与人工智能相关的基于遗传算法的移动机器人定位技术与三边定位技术的定位精度。作者考虑从遗传学和数据处理算法中借用适当的术语来解决这一技术问题。在使用遗传算法时,机器人的坐标是用角度法或刚性逻辑法找到的,由于定位不需要大量的数据,这些方法并不是特别有效,因此需要选择最可能的指标来找到到达目标的最佳路线。本研究中使用的遗传算法首先按照一定的准则选择数据进入第一种群,然后数据进入遗传算法的起始部分。每个个体都有代表数据序列的染色体,即基因。染色体编码后,进行以下遗传操作:杂交和突变。这些操作循环进行,直到找到适合度高的种群。解决方案是一系列选定的坐标,从中构建一个系统来确定到达目的地的最优路线。在坐标定位精度方面对机器人导航技术进行了比较。对色散和绝对定位误差的计算结果表明,遗传算法的定位误差小于三边法。遗传算法允许找到定位问题的最优解,同时减少传感器和其他测量设备的测量误差对结果的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信