Classification of Covid-19 Vaccines tweets using Naïve Bayes Classification

Jeethu Philip, Venkata Nagaraju Thatha, M. Harshini, I. Haritha, Shruti Patil, B. Veerasekhar Reddy
{"title":"Classification of Covid-19 Vaccines tweets using Naïve Bayes Classification","authors":"Jeethu Philip, Venkata Nagaraju Thatha, M. Harshini, I. Haritha, Shruti Patil, B. Veerasekhar Reddy","doi":"10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently COVID-19 has become the most discussed topic in different social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram etc. As time moves on, lot of messages and videos are posted in social media. As expected, most of the public followed these messages and becomes panic because of lack of information, misinformation about COVID-19 and its impact. This research study proposes a Twitter sentiment analysisbased on the most popular vaccines Covaxin, Covishield, and Pfizer. Most of the people expressed their feelings about vaccines in the twitter. Twitter API authentication is used here to extract the tweets. These extracted tweets are difficult to analyze, hence pre-processing has been done i.e., unstructured data is converted into structured format. After completion of preprocessing, the data is further classified by using Naïve Bayes algorithm. This algorithm performs data classification and divides it into three major classes as positive, negative, and neutral. The result shows that the covaxin yields 48.36% positive, 35.6% negative, and 16.04% neutral, Covishield yields 44.25% positive, 39.67% negative, and 16.08% neutral, Pfizer yields 42.95% positive, 39.45% negative, and 17.6% neutral sentiment.","PeriodicalId":356949,"journal":{"name":"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recently COVID-19 has become the most discussed topic in different social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram etc. As time moves on, lot of messages and videos are posted in social media. As expected, most of the public followed these messages and becomes panic because of lack of information, misinformation about COVID-19 and its impact. This research study proposes a Twitter sentiment analysisbased on the most popular vaccines Covaxin, Covishield, and Pfizer. Most of the people expressed their feelings about vaccines in the twitter. Twitter API authentication is used here to extract the tweets. These extracted tweets are difficult to analyze, hence pre-processing has been done i.e., unstructured data is converted into structured format. After completion of preprocessing, the data is further classified by using Naïve Bayes algorithm. This algorithm performs data classification and divides it into three major classes as positive, negative, and neutral. The result shows that the covaxin yields 48.36% positive, 35.6% negative, and 16.04% neutral, Covishield yields 44.25% positive, 39.67% negative, and 16.08% neutral, Pfizer yields 42.95% positive, 39.45% negative, and 17.6% neutral sentiment.
使用Naïve贝叶斯分类对Covid-19疫苗进行分类
最近,新冠肺炎成为推特、脸书、Instagram等社交媒体平台上讨论最多的话题。随着时间的推移,社交媒体上发布了很多信息和视频。正如预期的那样,大多数公众都关注了这些信息,并由于缺乏关于COVID-19及其影响的信息、错误信息而变得恐慌。本研究提出了一种基于最流行的疫苗Covaxin, Covishield和Pfizer的Twitter情绪分析。大多数人在推特上表达了他们对疫苗的看法。这里使用Twitter API身份验证来提取tweet。这些提取的推文难以分析,因此需要进行预处理,即将非结构化数据转换为结构化格式。预处理完成后,使用Naïve贝叶斯算法对数据进行进一步分类。该算法对数据进行分类,并将其分为正、负、中性三大类。结果表明,covaxin的阳性情绪率为48.36%,阴性情绪率为35.6%,中性情绪率为16.04%;Covishield的阳性情绪率为44.25%,阴性情绪率为39.67%,中性情绪率为16.08%;Pfizer的阳性情绪率为42.95%,阴性情绪率为39.45%,中性情绪率为17.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信