Modelling the Murray-Darling Basin Southern Connected System

A. Trim, G. Podger, D. Dutta, J. Puertas, Qld Vic, Sa
{"title":"Modelling the Murray-Darling Basin Southern Connected System","authors":"A. Trim, G. Podger, D. Dutta, J. Puertas, Qld Vic, Sa","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.trim","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The Southern Connected System (SCS) is located within the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. It comprises the Snowy Mountains Hydro-electric Scheme, the Murrumbidgee river system, and the Murray– Darling Basin river system. These systems are described by four river system models: the Snowy Hydro Scheme, Upper Murrumbidgee, regulated Murrumbidgee and the Lower-Darling and Murray. However, more broadly many other upstream river system models contribute flow and allocation information. These include the NSW Barwon-Darling model, and Victoria Kiewa, Ovens, and Goulburn-Broken-Campaspe-Coliban-Loddon models. Noting that the Barwon-Darling model receives contributions from 10 upstream river system models, including contributions from 5 Queensland river system models (Figure 1). Previously the SCS models were largely run independently with inputs from upstream models as fixed inputs for a range of development scenarios. However, there are a range of feedbacks between these models that are sufficiently large enough that they need to be considered. The SCS modelling suite considers the connections and feedbacks via an iterative approach. This is the first time that these feedbacks have been considered. This paper describes the physical and management connections between the models that describe the SCS. It details the feedbacks between the models and how this was managed within the modelling framework. It provides insights into the relative importance of the different variables and the importance of considering these within the broader modelling process of downstream systems. The results demonstrate the significance of modelling feedbacks through iterations and the need to be considered in future modelling of the SCS.","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.trim","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: The Southern Connected System (SCS) is located within the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. It comprises the Snowy Mountains Hydro-electric Scheme, the Murrumbidgee river system, and the Murray– Darling Basin river system. These systems are described by four river system models: the Snowy Hydro Scheme, Upper Murrumbidgee, regulated Murrumbidgee and the Lower-Darling and Murray. However, more broadly many other upstream river system models contribute flow and allocation information. These include the NSW Barwon-Darling model, and Victoria Kiewa, Ovens, and Goulburn-Broken-Campaspe-Coliban-Loddon models. Noting that the Barwon-Darling model receives contributions from 10 upstream river system models, including contributions from 5 Queensland river system models (Figure 1). Previously the SCS models were largely run independently with inputs from upstream models as fixed inputs for a range of development scenarios. However, there are a range of feedbacks between these models that are sufficiently large enough that they need to be considered. The SCS modelling suite considers the connections and feedbacks via an iterative approach. This is the first time that these feedbacks have been considered. This paper describes the physical and management connections between the models that describe the SCS. It details the feedbacks between the models and how this was managed within the modelling framework. It provides insights into the relative importance of the different variables and the importance of considering these within the broader modelling process of downstream systems. The results demonstrate the significance of modelling feedbacks through iterations and the need to be considered in future modelling of the SCS.
墨累—达令盆地南部连通体系的建模
南部连接系统(SCS)位于澳大利亚的墨累-达令盆地。它包括雪山水电计划、默伦比奇河系统和墨累-达令盆地河系统。这些系统由四种河流系统模型来描述:雪水计划、上默伦比奇河、管制的默伦比奇河以及下达令河和默里河。然而,更广泛地说,许多其他上游河流系统模型提供了流量和分配信息。其中包括NSW Barwon-Darling模型,Victoria Kiewa, Ovens和Goulburn-Broken-Campaspe-Coliban-Loddon模型。值得注意的是,Barwon-Darling模型得到了来自10个上游河流系统模型的贡献,包括来自5个昆士兰河流系统模型的贡献(图1)。以前,SCS模型在很大程度上是独立运行的,上游模型的输入作为一系列发展情景的固定输入。然而,这些模型之间的反馈范围足够大,需要加以考虑。SCS建模套件通过迭代方法考虑连接和反馈。这是第一次考虑到这些反馈。本文描述了描述SCS的模型之间的物理和管理联系。它详细说明了模型之间的反馈,以及如何在建模框架内管理这些反馈。它提供了对不同变量的相对重要性的见解,以及在下游系统更广泛的建模过程中考虑这些变量的重要性。结果表明了通过迭代建模反馈的重要性,以及在未来的SCS建模中需要考虑的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信