Binding scale dynamics

D. Divjak
{"title":"Binding scale dynamics","authors":"D. Divjak","doi":"10.1515/9783110607963-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper contributes to current debates in linguistic theory and meth-odology by focusing on discreteness versus continuity in linguistic description as well as on the importance of structure versus use for understanding mental rep-resentations of language phenomena. It does so through a case study on the Polish [finite verb + infinitive] construction, henceforth [Vfin Vinf]. Within a Cognitive Linguistic framework, Divjak (2007) proposed a structurally underpinned Binding Scale encompassing eight levels of looser to tighter integration, with verbs expressing modality, intention, attempt, result and phase representing the most integrated type of [Vfin Vinf] constructions. Cognitive Linguistics aims to give a usage-based account of the complex system that language is, grounded in general cognitive principles. But at which level of abstraction should we pitch the linguistic description of a system such as the [Vfin Vinf] system to find such mo-tivating principles at work? In this paper, I assess the distance between usage and structure by investigating whether the proposed Binding Scale can be relia-bly distinguished in judgments of usage events through statistical unsupervised learning. By experimenting with the type of abstraction that needs to be imposed on acceptability ratings to arrive at a meaningful classification, conclusions can be drawn about the social or mental nature of this structure.","PeriodicalId":244606,"journal":{"name":"Aspects of Linguistic Variation","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspects of Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607963-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This paper contributes to current debates in linguistic theory and meth-odology by focusing on discreteness versus continuity in linguistic description as well as on the importance of structure versus use for understanding mental rep-resentations of language phenomena. It does so through a case study on the Polish [finite verb + infinitive] construction, henceforth [Vfin Vinf]. Within a Cognitive Linguistic framework, Divjak (2007) proposed a structurally underpinned Binding Scale encompassing eight levels of looser to tighter integration, with verbs expressing modality, intention, attempt, result and phase representing the most integrated type of [Vfin Vinf] constructions. Cognitive Linguistics aims to give a usage-based account of the complex system that language is, grounded in general cognitive principles. But at which level of abstraction should we pitch the linguistic description of a system such as the [Vfin Vinf] system to find such mo-tivating principles at work? In this paper, I assess the distance between usage and structure by investigating whether the proposed Binding Scale can be relia-bly distinguished in judgments of usage events through statistical unsupervised learning. By experimenting with the type of abstraction that needs to be imposed on acceptability ratings to arrive at a meaningful classification, conclusions can be drawn about the social or mental nature of this structure.
绑定尺度动力学
本文通过关注语言描述中的离散性与连续性,以及结构与使用对理解语言现象的心理表征的重要性,为当前语言学理论和方法论的争论做出了贡献。本文通过对波兰语[有限动词+不定式]结构[Vfin Vinf]的案例研究来证明这一点。在认知语言学的框架内,Divjak(2007)提出了一种结构基础绑定量表,包含从松散到紧密整合的八个层次,其中表达情态、意图、尝试、结果和阶段的动词代表了最完整的[Vfin]结构类型。认知语言学的目的是在一般认知原则的基础上,对语言这个复杂的系统给出一个基于用法的解释。但是,我们应该在哪个抽象层次上对系统(如[Vfin Vinf]系统)进行语言描述,以找到起作用的激励原则呢?在本文中,我通过调查所提出的绑定量表是否可以通过统计无监督学习在使用事件的判断中可靠地区分,来评估用法和结构之间的距离。通过对需要强加于可接受性评级的抽象类型进行实验,从而得出有意义的分类,可以得出关于该结构的社会或心理性质的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信