{"title":"The Populist Response to the Pandemic: Perspectives from Brazil and Mexico","authors":"Dwight Wilson","doi":"10.31720/jga.5.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some governing officials and segments of populations have shown an unwillingness to treat the virus as a serious health risk at all. Rather than a standard case of politicization dividing the left and right, judgments of the threat posed by the coronavirus do not clearly align with traditional cleavages, as both left- and right-wing leaders have disregarded bad news about the pandemic. This paper examines the responses of the right-wing Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil and the left-wing Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of Mexico, both of whom trivialized and often dismissed the pandemic. These leaders share a populist style of politics which posits a struggle between a wholesome people on the one handand a class of parasitic elites on the other. This totalizing struggle in which the people must prevail mandates an agenticand oppositional posture toward national problems. Thus, populists spend more time attacking their perceived enemies than they do underlying conditions - like a virus - that can have no malevolent intentions. Populist movements therefore upend the capacity for recognizing material threats to public well-being, calling into question the capacity of populist governments to meet challenges likely to emerge in a post-COVID environment.","PeriodicalId":252739,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global and Area Studies(JGA)","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global and Area Studies(JGA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31720/jga.5.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Some governing officials and segments of populations have shown an unwillingness to treat the virus as a serious health risk at all. Rather than a standard case of politicization dividing the left and right, judgments of the threat posed by the coronavirus do not clearly align with traditional cleavages, as both left- and right-wing leaders have disregarded bad news about the pandemic. This paper examines the responses of the right-wing Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil and the left-wing Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of Mexico, both of whom trivialized and often dismissed the pandemic. These leaders share a populist style of politics which posits a struggle between a wholesome people on the one handand a class of parasitic elites on the other. This totalizing struggle in which the people must prevail mandates an agenticand oppositional posture toward national problems. Thus, populists spend more time attacking their perceived enemies than they do underlying conditions - like a virus - that can have no malevolent intentions. Populist movements therefore upend the capacity for recognizing material threats to public well-being, calling into question the capacity of populist governments to meet challenges likely to emerge in a post-COVID environment.
一些政府官员和部分人群表现出根本不愿意将这种病毒视为严重的健康风险。对冠状病毒所构成威胁的判断并不明显符合传统的分裂,而不是左派和右派的标准政治化案例,因为左翼和右翼领导人都无视有关大流行的坏消息。本文考察了巴西右翼总统雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗(Jair Bolsonaro)和墨西哥左翼总统安德烈斯·曼努埃尔·洛佩斯·奥夫拉多尔(Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador)的反应,他们都轻视并经常忽视疫情。这些领导人都有一种民粹主义的政治风格,即一方面是健康的人民,另一方面是寄生的精英阶层。这种人民必须取得胜利的全面斗争,要求对民族问题采取代理和反对的态度。因此,民粹主义者把更多的时间花在攻击他们眼中的敌人上,而不是对付根本没有恶意的情况(比如病毒)。因此,民粹主义运动颠覆了识别公共福祉面临的物质威胁的能力,令人质疑民粹主义政府应对后疫情环境中可能出现的挑战的能力。