Concilium: Collaborative Diagnosis of Broken Overlay Routes

James W. Mickens, Brian D. Noble
{"title":"Concilium: Collaborative Diagnosis of Broken Overlay Routes","authors":"James W. Mickens, Brian D. Noble","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2007.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a peer-to-peer overlay network, hosts cooperate to forward messages. When a message does not reach its final destination, there are two possible explanations. An intermediate overlay host may have dropped the message due to misconfiguration or malice. Alternatively, a bad link in the underlying IP network may have prevented an earnest, properly configured host from forwarding the data. In this paper, we describe how overlay peers can distinguish between the two situations and ascribe blame appropriately. We generate probabilistic notions of blame using distributed network tomography, fuzzy logic, and secure routing primitives. By comparing application-level drop rates with network characteristics inferred from tomography, we can estimate the likelihood that message loss is due to a misbehaving overlay host or a poor link in the underlying IP network. Since faulty nodes can submit inaccurate tomographic data to the collective, we also discuss mechanisms for detecting such misbehavior.","PeriodicalId":405751,"journal":{"name":"37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'07)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2007.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In a peer-to-peer overlay network, hosts cooperate to forward messages. When a message does not reach its final destination, there are two possible explanations. An intermediate overlay host may have dropped the message due to misconfiguration or malice. Alternatively, a bad link in the underlying IP network may have prevented an earnest, properly configured host from forwarding the data. In this paper, we describe how overlay peers can distinguish between the two situations and ascribe blame appropriately. We generate probabilistic notions of blame using distributed network tomography, fuzzy logic, and secure routing primitives. By comparing application-level drop rates with network characteristics inferred from tomography, we can estimate the likelihood that message loss is due to a misbehaving overlay host or a poor link in the underlying IP network. Since faulty nodes can submit inaccurate tomographic data to the collective, we also discuss mechanisms for detecting such misbehavior.
Concilium:破碎覆盖路线的协同诊断
在点对点覆盖网络中,主机合作转发消息。当消息没有到达最终目的地时,有两种可能的解释。中间覆盖主机可能由于配置错误或恶意而丢弃了消息。另一种情况是,底层IP网络中的错误链接可能会阻止认真的、正确配置的主机转发数据。在本文中,我们描述了覆盖对等体如何区分这两种情况并适当地归咎于责任。我们使用分布式网络断层扫描、模糊逻辑和安全路由原语生成责任的概率概念。通过比较应用程序级的丢失率与从断层扫描推断的网络特征,我们可以估计消息丢失是由于底层IP网络中行为不端的覆盖主机或不良链路造成的可能性。由于故障节点可能向集体提交不准确的层析成像数据,我们还讨论了检测此类错误行为的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信