The Relationship between Selective Attention and Agility, Speed and Technical Skill Performances of Young Football Players: Cross-Sectional Research

A. Kurt, Gonca Ince
{"title":"The Relationship between Selective Attention and Agility, Speed and Technical Skill Performances of Young Football Players: Cross-Sectional Research","authors":"A. Kurt, Gonca Ince","doi":"10.5336/sportsci.2021-82165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: In this study, the relationships between se- lective attention, speed, agility and technical skill performances of football players were examined. Material and Methods: Eighty-six licensed male soccer players from Adanaspor infrastructure teams par-ticipated voluntarily. The means of the participants was ages (16.07±1.52 years), heights (172.08±8.71 cm), body weights (59.49±9.56 kg), and sports ages (6.17±1.83 years) respectively. Par- ticipants were implied the d2 attention test [total number of items (TN), total norm-error (TN-E), concentration performance (CP)], the Hacettepe University Football Area (HUFA) test (HUFA1=without ball, HUFA2=with ball) for technique skills, the 30 m Sprint Test (30 m-ST) and the Illinois Agility Test (IAT). Besides, a short form was used to determine for the characteristics of participants. In addition, participants were compared according to the categories of play position and league. One-way analysis of variance was used for statistical evaluations. It was preferred to use the Bonferroni test to determine which group caused the difference. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated in order to determine the relationships between the variables. Results: In statistical analysis, a low-level negative significant rela- tionship was found between TN and the results of HUFA1 (r=-0.25), HUFA2 (r=-0.25) and 30 m-ST (r=-0.24) (p ≤ 0.05). A low-level nega- tive significant relationship was found between TN-E, HUFA1 (r=-0.24), HUFA2 (r=-0.32) and IAT (r=-0.22) and 30 m-ST (r=-0.22) results (p ≤ 0.05). A low-level negative correlation was found between CP and HUFA2 test (r=-0.31; p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: We can suggest that selective attention-related practices that can be done during training can be particularly effective on athlete technical skill performances.","PeriodicalId":177041,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/sportsci.2021-82165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABS TRACT Objective: In this study, the relationships between se- lective attention, speed, agility and technical skill performances of football players were examined. Material and Methods: Eighty-six licensed male soccer players from Adanaspor infrastructure teams par-ticipated voluntarily. The means of the participants was ages (16.07±1.52 years), heights (172.08±8.71 cm), body weights (59.49±9.56 kg), and sports ages (6.17±1.83 years) respectively. Par- ticipants were implied the d2 attention test [total number of items (TN), total norm-error (TN-E), concentration performance (CP)], the Hacettepe University Football Area (HUFA) test (HUFA1=without ball, HUFA2=with ball) for technique skills, the 30 m Sprint Test (30 m-ST) and the Illinois Agility Test (IAT). Besides, a short form was used to determine for the characteristics of participants. In addition, participants were compared according to the categories of play position and league. One-way analysis of variance was used for statistical evaluations. It was preferred to use the Bonferroni test to determine which group caused the difference. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated in order to determine the relationships between the variables. Results: In statistical analysis, a low-level negative significant rela- tionship was found between TN and the results of HUFA1 (r=-0.25), HUFA2 (r=-0.25) and 30 m-ST (r=-0.24) (p ≤ 0.05). A low-level nega- tive significant relationship was found between TN-E, HUFA1 (r=-0.24), HUFA2 (r=-0.32) and IAT (r=-0.22) and 30 m-ST (r=-0.22) results (p ≤ 0.05). A low-level negative correlation was found between CP and HUFA2 test (r=-0.31; p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: We can suggest that selective attention-related practices that can be done during training can be particularly effective on athlete technical skill performances.
青少年足球运动员选择性注意与敏捷性、速度和技术水平的关系:横断面研究
摘要目的:探讨足球运动员选择性注意、速度、敏捷性与技术水平的关系。材料和方法:来自Adanaspor基础设施队的86名有执照的男性足球运动员自愿参加。平均年龄(16.07±1.52岁)、身高(172.08±8.71 cm)、体重(59.49±9.56 kg)、运动年龄(6.17±1.83岁)。被试采用d2注意测试[总项目数(TN)、总规范误差(TN- e)、集中表现(CP)]、Hacettepe大学足球区(HUFA)技术技能测试(HUFA1=无球,HUFA2=有球)、30米冲刺测试(30米- st)和伊利诺伊敏捷性测试(IAT)。此外,还使用了一个简短的表格来确定参与者的特征。此外,根据比赛位置和联赛类别对参与者进行了比较。采用单因素方差分析进行统计评价。我们更倾向于使用Bonferroni测试来确定是哪一组导致了这种差异。计算Pearson相关系数以确定变量之间的关系。结果:经统计学分析,TN与HUFA1 (r=-0.25)、HUFA2 (r=-0.25)、30 m-ST (r=-0.24)呈低水平负相关(p≤0.05)。TN-E、HUFA1 (r=-0.24)、HUFA2 (r=-0.32)、IAT (r=-0.22)与30 m-ST (r=-0.22)结果呈低水平负相关(p≤0.05)。CP与HUFA2检测呈低水平负相关(r=-0.31;P≤0.05)。结论:我们可以建议在训练中进行选择性注意相关练习,对运动员的技术技能表现特别有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信