Tax Avoidance — Methodology for Quantification and the Case of the Netherlands

M. Kerste, B. Baarsma, J. Weda
{"title":"Tax Avoidance — Methodology for Quantification and the Case of the Netherlands","authors":"M. Kerste, B. Baarsma, J. Weda","doi":"10.11114/IJLPA.V2I1.4277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to define and quantitatively measure tax avoidance. So far any rigorous assessment of financial flows related to tax avoidance that entails paying (almost) no taxes, is lacking. This prevents a proper assessment of the necessity for further regulation to fight such undesirable tax avoidance. Quantifying tax avoidance provides a sound starting point for assessing the severity of regulation – matching the expected benefits with costs – and sheds further light on the possible design of effective regulation. The paper defines tax avoidance as the legal use of tax constructions aimed at paying (almost) no taxes in the entire international financial chain. Our paper shows that in order to prevent international tax systems from being used for such double non-taxation, governments could introduce a withholding tax on outgoing interest and royalty flows to low tax jurisdictions (tax havens). If the low tax threshold is set at 15% or 10% respectively, then depending on the choice for one of the two provided definitions of ‘low tax jurisdiction’, we find that the combined outgoing royalty and interest flow related to tax avoidance via Dutch conduit companies was on average 9.7 or 11.9 billion euro per year in the period 2009-2013.","PeriodicalId":231433,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Public Administration","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/IJLPA.V2I1.4277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to define and quantitatively measure tax avoidance. So far any rigorous assessment of financial flows related to tax avoidance that entails paying (almost) no taxes, is lacking. This prevents a proper assessment of the necessity for further regulation to fight such undesirable tax avoidance. Quantifying tax avoidance provides a sound starting point for assessing the severity of regulation – matching the expected benefits with costs – and sheds further light on the possible design of effective regulation. The paper defines tax avoidance as the legal use of tax constructions aimed at paying (almost) no taxes in the entire international financial chain. Our paper shows that in order to prevent international tax systems from being used for such double non-taxation, governments could introduce a withholding tax on outgoing interest and royalty flows to low tax jurisdictions (tax havens). If the low tax threshold is set at 15% or 10% respectively, then depending on the choice for one of the two provided definitions of ‘low tax jurisdiction’, we find that the combined outgoing royalty and interest flow related to tax avoidance via Dutch conduit companies was on average 9.7 or 11.9 billion euro per year in the period 2009-2013.
避税-量化方法和荷兰案例
本文的目的是定义和定量衡量避税。到目前为止,还缺乏对避税相关资金流动的严格评估,因为避税几乎不需要缴税。这妨碍了对进一步监管以打击此类不受欢迎的避税行为的必要性进行适当评估。对避税行为进行量化,为评估监管的严厉程度——将预期收益与成本相匹配——提供了一个良好的起点,并进一步阐明了有效监管的可能设计。本文将避税定义为在整个国际金融链中合法使用旨在支付(几乎)不纳税的税收结构。我们的论文表明,为了防止国际税收制度被用于这种双重不征税,政府可以对流入低税收管辖区(避税天堂)的利息和特许权使用费的流出征收预扣税。如果低税门槛分别设定为15%或10%,那么根据所提供的两种“低税管辖权”定义之一的选择,我们发现,2009年至2013年期间,通过荷兰管道公司避税相关的合计流出特许权使用费和利息流平均每年为97亿欧元或119亿欧元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信