Development and Validation of the Criminal Thinking Scale (CTS)

Opeyemi Olubusuyi Fasanu, H. Osinowo
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Criminal Thinking Scale (CTS)","authors":"Opeyemi Olubusuyi Fasanu, H. Osinowo","doi":"10.36349/easjpbs.2023.v05i04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed the development and validation of the Criminal Thinking Scale (CTS), an assessment tool for measuring criminal thinking patterns. Two hundred and seventy institutionalised inmates participated in the study by responding to a survey comprising items of the Criminal Thinking Scale developed in this study. Additionally, the Texas Christian University Criminal Thinking Scale (Cronbach’s α = .84), Early Trauma Inventory Self-Report (Cronbach’s α = .89), Parenting Style Inventory-II (Cronbach’s α = .75) were administered as well for construct validity purposes. The result of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed the presence of three components of criminal thinking among items of the Criminal Thinking Scale which were labelled as morality averseness, rationalisation, and retaliatory reasoning with reliability Cronbach’s alpha of .87, .78, .76 respectively. The overall reliability yielded Cronbach’s alpha of .92. In addition, the Criminal Thinking Scale demonstrated concurrent validity with similar measures, that is, Texas Christian University Criminal Thinking Scale [r = .31, p < .01] and showed discriminant validity with Parenting Style Inventory-II [r = -.06, p > .05] and the Early Trauma Inventory Self-Report [r = .07, p > .05]. The study concluded that CTS is a valid and reliable measure of criminal thinking.","PeriodicalId":320629,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjpbs.2023.v05i04.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed the development and validation of the Criminal Thinking Scale (CTS), an assessment tool for measuring criminal thinking patterns. Two hundred and seventy institutionalised inmates participated in the study by responding to a survey comprising items of the Criminal Thinking Scale developed in this study. Additionally, the Texas Christian University Criminal Thinking Scale (Cronbach’s α = .84), Early Trauma Inventory Self-Report (Cronbach’s α = .89), Parenting Style Inventory-II (Cronbach’s α = .75) were administered as well for construct validity purposes. The result of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed the presence of three components of criminal thinking among items of the Criminal Thinking Scale which were labelled as morality averseness, rationalisation, and retaliatory reasoning with reliability Cronbach’s alpha of .87, .78, .76 respectively. The overall reliability yielded Cronbach’s alpha of .92. In addition, the Criminal Thinking Scale demonstrated concurrent validity with similar measures, that is, Texas Christian University Criminal Thinking Scale [r = .31, p < .01] and showed discriminant validity with Parenting Style Inventory-II [r = -.06, p > .05] and the Early Trauma Inventory Self-Report [r = .07, p > .05]. The study concluded that CTS is a valid and reliable measure of criminal thinking.
犯罪思维量表(CTS)的编制与验证
本研究的目的是开发和验证犯罪思维量表(CTS),这是一个衡量犯罪思维模式的评估工具。270名被收容的囚犯参与了这项研究,他们回答了一项调查,其中包括在这项研究中开发的犯罪思维量表的项目。此外,采用德克萨斯基督教大学犯罪思维量表(Cronbach’s α = 0.84)、早期创伤量表自我报告(Cronbach’s α = 0.89)、父母教养方式量表- ii (Cronbach’s α = 0.75)进行建构效度测试。主成分分析(PCA)的结果证实了犯罪思维量表中存在三个犯罪思维成分,分别是道德厌恶、合理化和报复性推理,其信度分别为0.87、0.78和0.76。总体信度的Cronbach 's alpha为0.92。此外,犯罪思维量表与同类量表即德克萨斯基督教大学犯罪思维量表具有并发效度[r = .31, p < .01],与父母教养方式量表- ii具有判别效度[r = -]。早期创伤量表自我报告[r = .07, p > .05]。研究得出结论,CTS是一种有效可靠的犯罪思维测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信