Distributed Enforcement of Unlinkability Policies: Looking Beyond the Chinese Wall

Apu Kapadia, P. Naldurg, R. Campbell
{"title":"Distributed Enforcement of Unlinkability Policies: Looking Beyond the Chinese Wall","authors":"Apu Kapadia, P. Naldurg, R. Campbell","doi":"10.1109/POLICY.2007.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a discretionary access control framework that can be used to control a principal's ability to link information from two or more audit records and compromise a user's privacy. While the traditional Chinese Wall (CW) access control model is sufficient to enforce this type of unlinkability, in distributed environments CW is inefficient because its semantics requires knowledge of a user's access history. We propose a restricted version of the CW model in which policies are easy to enforce in a decentralized manner without the need for an access history. Our architecture analyzes system policies for potential linkability conflicts. Users can identify specific threats to their privacy, typically in terms of trusted and untrusted roles in the context of RBAC (role based access control), following which the system attaches automatically generated policy constraints to the audit records. When these constraints are enforced appropriately, they implement unlinkability policies that are provably secure and precise for a fixed protection state. We extend the model with a versioning scheme that can handle evolving protection state, including changing roles and permissions, trading precision to maintain the security of deployed policies.","PeriodicalId":240693,"journal":{"name":"Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07)","volume":"22 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/POLICY.2007.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We present a discretionary access control framework that can be used to control a principal's ability to link information from two or more audit records and compromise a user's privacy. While the traditional Chinese Wall (CW) access control model is sufficient to enforce this type of unlinkability, in distributed environments CW is inefficient because its semantics requires knowledge of a user's access history. We propose a restricted version of the CW model in which policies are easy to enforce in a decentralized manner without the need for an access history. Our architecture analyzes system policies for potential linkability conflicts. Users can identify specific threats to their privacy, typically in terms of trusted and untrusted roles in the context of RBAC (role based access control), following which the system attaches automatically generated policy constraints to the audit records. When these constraints are enforced appropriately, they implement unlinkability policies that are provably secure and precise for a fixed protection state. We extend the model with a versioning scheme that can handle evolving protection state, including changing roles and permissions, trading precision to maintain the security of deployed policies.
不可链接策略的分布式执行:超越中国墙
我们提出了一个可自由支配的访问控制框架,该框架可用于控制委托人链接来自两个或多个审计记录的信息并损害用户隐私的能力。虽然传统的中国墙(CW)访问控制模型足以执行这种类型的不可链接性,但在分布式环境中,CW是低效的,因为它的语义需要了解用户的访问历史。我们提出了CW模型的限制版本,其中策略很容易以分散的方式执行,而不需要访问历史记录。我们的架构分析了潜在的链接性冲突的系统策略。用户可以识别对其隐私的特定威胁,通常根据RBAC(基于角色的访问控制)上下文中的可信和不可信角色进行识别,然后系统将自动生成的策略约束附加到审计记录。当适当地实施这些约束时,它们将实现不可链接性策略,这些策略对于固定的保护状态是可证明的安全和精确的。我们使用一个版本控制方案扩展模型,该方案可以处理不断变化的保护状态,包括更改角色和权限,交换精度以维护已部署策略的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信