J. Lönnqvist, M. Verkasalo, G. Walkowitz, P. Wichardt
{"title":"Social Preferences, Efficiency and Personal Values in Ultimatum Bargaining","authors":"J. Lönnqvist, M. Verkasalo, G. Walkowitz, P. Wichardt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2240366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do people trade off efficiency against equality concerns? To study this question, we conducted a modified mini ultimatum game (N=120) in which proposers were asked to choose between offering 8:2 and y:y, y∈{5, 4.5, 4,.., 0.5}; all offers in Euro. According to the data, 58 of 60 proposers have a unique switching point towards the unequal split and the majority of switching occurs between 3.5:3.5 and 2:2. Regarding the variance of the switching, we find that subjects with a comparably high interest in control over resources (higher Power values) tend to switch earlier. Moreover, after reversing roles, subjects who have previously been responders show a far stronger inclination to stick to the equal split indicating that knowing how it is to be in the other's shoes increases other-regarding behaviour.","PeriodicalId":104123,"journal":{"name":"Negotiation Processes & Communications eJournal","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Negotiation Processes & Communications eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2240366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
How do people trade off efficiency against equality concerns? To study this question, we conducted a modified mini ultimatum game (N=120) in which proposers were asked to choose between offering 8:2 and y:y, y∈{5, 4.5, 4,.., 0.5}; all offers in Euro. According to the data, 58 of 60 proposers have a unique switching point towards the unequal split and the majority of switching occurs between 3.5:3.5 and 2:2. Regarding the variance of the switching, we find that subjects with a comparably high interest in control over resources (higher Power values) tend to switch earlier. Moreover, after reversing roles, subjects who have previously been responders show a far stronger inclination to stick to the equal split indicating that knowing how it is to be in the other's shoes increases other-regarding behaviour.