Analysis of The Nature of Science in Chemistry Textbooks on The Topic Acid-Base Equilibrium: a Content Analysis

A. Rahmah, S. Ariani, B. Mulyani
{"title":"Analysis of The Nature of Science in Chemistry Textbooks on The Topic Acid-Base Equilibrium: a Content Analysis","authors":"A. Rahmah, S. Ariani, B. Mulyani","doi":"10.20961/jkpk.v7i3.65094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to describe aspects of the Nature of Science (NoS), its presentation, and its scores from chemistry textbooks used in Surakarta on acid-base equilibrium topics. This research was qualitative research with a content analysis method. Three high school chemistry textbooks for class XI from different publishers were analyzed by two raters based on ten aspects of the NoS. Interrater reliability was calculated using the cohen Kappa. The results showed that a scientific law is the only aspect that is not included in the three textbooks A, B, and C. Other aspects of NoS contained in textbooks A and B are slightly different from textbook C. Textbooks A and B contain the same aspects: empirical, inferential, creative, theory-driven, tentative, scientific methods, scientific theories, social science, and the application of science in socio-cultural, while textbook C does not contain tentative and theory-driven aspects. The implicit-correct category dominates the presentation of the NoS aspects in the textbooks. Presentations with implicit-incorrect and explicit-incorrect categories were not found in this study. The scores obtained by textbooks A, B, and C based on the presentation of aspects of NoS are 9, 11, and 8, respectively, of the maximum total score that can be obtained of 30. It did not show the presence of the NoS aspects explicitly, correctly, consistently, and completely, so textbooks containing NoS explicitly are required. Teachers also need to guide students in interpreting NoS in learning. ","PeriodicalId":394335,"journal":{"name":"JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v7i3.65094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to describe aspects of the Nature of Science (NoS), its presentation, and its scores from chemistry textbooks used in Surakarta on acid-base equilibrium topics. This research was qualitative research with a content analysis method. Three high school chemistry textbooks for class XI from different publishers were analyzed by two raters based on ten aspects of the NoS. Interrater reliability was calculated using the cohen Kappa. The results showed that a scientific law is the only aspect that is not included in the three textbooks A, B, and C. Other aspects of NoS contained in textbooks A and B are slightly different from textbook C. Textbooks A and B contain the same aspects: empirical, inferential, creative, theory-driven, tentative, scientific methods, scientific theories, social science, and the application of science in socio-cultural, while textbook C does not contain tentative and theory-driven aspects. The implicit-correct category dominates the presentation of the NoS aspects in the textbooks. Presentations with implicit-incorrect and explicit-incorrect categories were not found in this study. The scores obtained by textbooks A, B, and C based on the presentation of aspects of NoS are 9, 11, and 8, respectively, of the maximum total score that can be obtained of 30. It did not show the presence of the NoS aspects explicitly, correctly, consistently, and completely, so textbooks containing NoS explicitly are required. Teachers also need to guide students in interpreting NoS in learning. 
《酸碱平衡》化学教材的科学性质分析:内容分析
本研究是为了描述科学的本质(NoS)的各个方面,它的表现,以及它在雅加达使用的化学教科书中酸碱平衡主题的分数。本研究采用内容分析法进行定性研究。以不同出版社出版的3本高中化学11班教材为研究对象,采用两名评分者基于10个方面的NoS进行分析,采用cohen Kappa法计算评分者的信度。结果表明:科学规律是a、B、C三种教科书中唯一未包含的方面。a、B三种教科书中包含的NoS的其他方面与C稍有不同。a、B两种教科书包含经验、推理、创造性、理论驱动、试探性、科学方法、科学理论、社会科学、科学在社会文化中的应用等方面,而C教科书不包含试探性和理论驱动方面。在教科书中,隐含正确的范畴主导着不正确方面的表现。本研究未发现内隐不正确和外显不正确类别的报告。教材A、教材B、教材C根据NoS各方面的呈现得到的分数分别为9分、11分、8分,满分为30分。它没有明确、正确、一致和完整地显示NoS方面的存在,因此需要明确包含NoS的教科书。教师还需要引导学生在学习中解读NoS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信