Combining a Smart Pricing Policy with a Simple Replenishment Policy: Managing Uncertainties in the Presence of Stochastic Purchase Returns

Alys Jiaxin Liang, Stefanus Jasin, J. Uichanco
{"title":"Combining a Smart Pricing Policy with a Simple Replenishment Policy: Managing Uncertainties in the Presence of Stochastic Purchase Returns","authors":"Alys Jiaxin Liang, Stefanus Jasin, J. Uichanco","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3563847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regarded as the ``ticking time bomb'' in the industry, returns have cost retailers hundreds of billions of dollars in the US. This has prompted businesses to adapt by charging extra delivery fees, increasing prices (to compensate for the return cost) or allowing ``returnless refunds''. Undesirable as returns are, it is generally accepted that they cannot be entirely eliminated and lenient return policies are necessary to maintain customer loyalty. Motivated by this reality, we ask: How can a retailer offering a free return and refund policy improve profitability through joint inventory and pricing control? We model a single store/warehouse setting with lost sales, positive lead time, periodic review, and Binomial (Poisson) demand. Any purchase can be returned at a full refund within a grace period and might be restocked after passing inspection. Jointly optimizing inventory and pricing is challenging since the state variables must track the return status of all past purchases. We develop an easy-to-implement heuristic policy that combines a ``smart'' adaptive pricing policy with a very simple replenishment policy. Our key insight is that uncertainties in both demands and returns are effectively managed by the price control. We show that the relative loss of this policy converges to zero at a rate much faster than the usual square-root when the annual market size becomes large. In addition, our results can be extended to more general settings including: (1) return fees and partial refunds; (2) non-stationary demand rate functions; and, (3) service level constraints.","PeriodicalId":200007,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3563847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regarded as the ``ticking time bomb'' in the industry, returns have cost retailers hundreds of billions of dollars in the US. This has prompted businesses to adapt by charging extra delivery fees, increasing prices (to compensate for the return cost) or allowing ``returnless refunds''. Undesirable as returns are, it is generally accepted that they cannot be entirely eliminated and lenient return policies are necessary to maintain customer loyalty. Motivated by this reality, we ask: How can a retailer offering a free return and refund policy improve profitability through joint inventory and pricing control? We model a single store/warehouse setting with lost sales, positive lead time, periodic review, and Binomial (Poisson) demand. Any purchase can be returned at a full refund within a grace period and might be restocked after passing inspection. Jointly optimizing inventory and pricing is challenging since the state variables must track the return status of all past purchases. We develop an easy-to-implement heuristic policy that combines a ``smart'' adaptive pricing policy with a very simple replenishment policy. Our key insight is that uncertainties in both demands and returns are effectively managed by the price control. We show that the relative loss of this policy converges to zero at a rate much faster than the usual square-root when the annual market size becomes large. In addition, our results can be extended to more general settings including: (1) return fees and partial refunds; (2) non-stationary demand rate functions; and, (3) service level constraints.
结合智能定价策略和简单补货策略:随机采购退货情况下的不确定性管理
退货被视为该行业的“定时炸弹”,已使美国零售商损失了数千亿美元。这促使商家通过收取额外运费、提高价格(以补偿退货成本)或允许“无退货退款”来适应。尽管退货是不受欢迎的,但人们普遍认为退货不能完全消除,为了保持顾客的忠诚度,宽松的退货政策是必要的。在这种现实的激励下,我们问:提供免费退货和退款政策的零售商如何通过联合库存和价格控制来提高盈利能力?我们对单个商店/仓库设置进行建模,其中包含销售损失、积极的交货时间、定期审查和二项(泊松)需求。任何购买都可以在宽限期内全额退款,并可能在通过检查后重新进货。联合优化库存和定价是具有挑战性的,因为状态变量必须跟踪所有过去购买的退货状态。我们开发了一种易于实现的启发式策略,将“智能”自适应定价策略与非常简单的补货策略相结合。我们的主要观点是,需求和回报的不确定性都是通过价格控制来有效管理的。我们表明,当年度市场规模变大时,该政策的相对损失以比通常的平方根更快的速度收敛于零。此外,我们的结果可以扩展到更一般的设置,包括:(1)退货费用和部分退款;(2)非平稳需求率函数;(3)服务水平约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信