A “Science of Ethics”?

D. Willard, Steven L. Porter, A. Preston, G. T. Elshof
{"title":"A “Science of Ethics”?","authors":"D. Willard, Steven L. Porter, A. Preston, G. T. Elshof","doi":"10.4324/9780429491764-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"hank you for inviting me to speak this evening. Sigma Pi Sigma is an important organization with much potential as yet untapped to serve society. Since service has been a strong aspect of my own career, I particularly admire Sigma Pi Sigma's emphasis on \" Service \" as one of its four themes. We need more science colleagues who are willing to learn about effective service and to take the time to serve well. One of the consequences of America's tendency to under-produce scientists is that they do not spill over into other careers where science knowledge would be useful but is not essential. So we rely on volunteers from the ranks of science researchers and students and teachers to bring technical skills and knowledge into the broader operations of society, and particularly of government. There are many opportunities to do this in Washington, and I encourage everyone to look into the variety of summer fellowships and internships that place service-minded scientists in government offices. Michael Faraday, who was famous for his popular science lectures, said you should never begin with an apology. So I will not apologize for speaking about ethics, a field far beyond my expertise. I am comfortable with this declaration because so many others who choose to talk about ethics seem to have no more expertise than I do, so I am in good company. I will also confess at the outset that I do not think \" science ethics \" differs from any other kind of ethics, nor do I think there is a unique \" government perspective \" on ethics. But there are some things to say about ethics in its relation to both science and government , and I will try to be clear about them in my remarks. ETHICS IN GENERAL Like physics, ethics has a theoretical part and an experimental part—or a philosophical side and a practical side, and they ought to work together. When talking about ethics and science, the philosophical part is important because the status of truth in ethics is so completely different from truth in science. From the science perspective, ethical standards are arbitrary. That is, there is no empirical test for them. So they are neither true nor false. As a practical matter, however, ethical principles that people everywhere have adopted throughout history have certain commonalities such as the Golden Rule of treating others as you …","PeriodicalId":186940,"journal":{"name":"The Disappearance of Moral Knowledge","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Disappearance of Moral Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491764-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

hank you for inviting me to speak this evening. Sigma Pi Sigma is an important organization with much potential as yet untapped to serve society. Since service has been a strong aspect of my own career, I particularly admire Sigma Pi Sigma's emphasis on " Service " as one of its four themes. We need more science colleagues who are willing to learn about effective service and to take the time to serve well. One of the consequences of America's tendency to under-produce scientists is that they do not spill over into other careers where science knowledge would be useful but is not essential. So we rely on volunteers from the ranks of science researchers and students and teachers to bring technical skills and knowledge into the broader operations of society, and particularly of government. There are many opportunities to do this in Washington, and I encourage everyone to look into the variety of summer fellowships and internships that place service-minded scientists in government offices. Michael Faraday, who was famous for his popular science lectures, said you should never begin with an apology. So I will not apologize for speaking about ethics, a field far beyond my expertise. I am comfortable with this declaration because so many others who choose to talk about ethics seem to have no more expertise than I do, so I am in good company. I will also confess at the outset that I do not think " science ethics " differs from any other kind of ethics, nor do I think there is a unique " government perspective " on ethics. But there are some things to say about ethics in its relation to both science and government , and I will try to be clear about them in my remarks. ETHICS IN GENERAL Like physics, ethics has a theoretical part and an experimental part—or a philosophical side and a practical side, and they ought to work together. When talking about ethics and science, the philosophical part is important because the status of truth in ethics is so completely different from truth in science. From the science perspective, ethical standards are arbitrary. That is, there is no empirical test for them. So they are neither true nor false. As a practical matter, however, ethical principles that people everywhere have adopted throughout history have certain commonalities such as the Golden Rule of treating others as you …
“伦理学的科学”?
谢谢你们邀请我今晚演讲。西格玛派西格玛是一个重要的组织,有很多潜力尚未开发,以服务社会。由于服务一直是我职业生涯的一个重要方面,我特别欣赏西格玛派西格玛强调“服务”作为它的四个主题之一。我们需要更多的科学同事,他们愿意学习有效的服务,并愿意花时间做好服务。美国科学家辈出不足的趋势造成的后果之一是,他们无法进入其他科学知识有用但不是必需的职业。因此,我们依靠来自科研人员、学生和教师队伍中的志愿者,将技术技能和知识应用到更广泛的社会运作中,特别是政府的运作中。在华盛顿有很多这样的机会,我鼓励每个人都去寻找各种各样的暑期奖学金和实习机会,让有服务意识的科学家进入政府办公室。以科普讲座而闻名的迈克尔·法拉第(Michael Faraday)说,你永远不应该以道歉开始。所以我不会为谈论道德而道歉,这是一个远远超出我专业范围的领域。我对这个声明很满意,因为很多选择谈论道德的人似乎并不比我更专业,所以我有很多同伴。我也要在一开始就承认,我并不认为“科学伦理学”与任何其他类型的伦理学有什么不同,我也不认为在伦理学上有什么独特的“政府视角”。但是,关于伦理与科学和政府的关系,有一些事情要讲,我将在我的讲话中尽量说清楚。像物理学一样,伦理学有理论部分和实验部分——或者有哲学方面和实践方面,它们应该一起工作。在谈论伦理与科学时,哲学部分很重要,因为真理在伦理中的地位与科学中的地位是完全不同的。从科学的角度来看,伦理标准是武断的。也就是说,它们没有经验检验。所以它们既不是真的也不是假的。然而,作为一个实际问题,纵观历史,世界各地的人们所采用的道德原则都有一定的共性,比如“待人如己”的黄金法则……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信