13. Information: Public Access, Protecting Privacy and Surveillance

P. Birkinshaw
{"title":"13. Information: Public Access, Protecting Privacy and Surveillance","authors":"P. Birkinshaw","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198806363.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Freedom of Information Act is a statute of great constitutional significance. The Act heralded a right to publicly held information which government had attempted to keep private. FOIA laws have their origins in the pre-digital age and any discussion of information rights must take on board the contemporary reality of the global digitization of communications via social media networks and the enhanced capabilities of state intelligence agencies to conduct surveillance over electronic communications. The General Data Protection Regulation seeks to give greater security to personal data. However, private information is harvested by private tech companies which they have obtained often ‘voluntarily’ and used by intermediaries to influence public events, public power and elections—as illustrated by recent scandals involving the practice of ‘data farming’ by social media networks and the sale of personal data to political campaign consultants seeking to pinpoint electors and thereby affect the outcomes of national elections and referenda. Government surveillance is age-old, but the emergence of digital power has enabled public authority to invade our private lives far more intrusively and effectively. The most recent example is the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. All this poses substantial challenges for the public regulation of information access in a growing confusion of public and private in the constitution. Courts, meanwhile, have to balance demands for privacy protection, open justice and secrecy.","PeriodicalId":173423,"journal":{"name":"The Changing Constitution","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Changing Constitution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198806363.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Freedom of Information Act is a statute of great constitutional significance. The Act heralded a right to publicly held information which government had attempted to keep private. FOIA laws have their origins in the pre-digital age and any discussion of information rights must take on board the contemporary reality of the global digitization of communications via social media networks and the enhanced capabilities of state intelligence agencies to conduct surveillance over electronic communications. The General Data Protection Regulation seeks to give greater security to personal data. However, private information is harvested by private tech companies which they have obtained often ‘voluntarily’ and used by intermediaries to influence public events, public power and elections—as illustrated by recent scandals involving the practice of ‘data farming’ by social media networks and the sale of personal data to political campaign consultants seeking to pinpoint electors and thereby affect the outcomes of national elections and referenda. Government surveillance is age-old, but the emergence of digital power has enabled public authority to invade our private lives far more intrusively and effectively. The most recent example is the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. All this poses substantial challenges for the public regulation of information access in a growing confusion of public and private in the constitution. Courts, meanwhile, have to balance demands for privacy protection, open justice and secrecy.
13. 信息:公众访问,保护隐私和监视
《信息自由法》是一部具有重要宪法意义的法律。该法案宣告了政府试图保密的公开信息的权利。《信息自由法》起源于前数字时代,任何关于信息权利的讨论都必须考虑到当今社会媒体网络全球通信数字化的现实,以及国家情报机构对电子通信进行监控的能力增强。《一般资料保护条例》旨在加强个人资料的安全。然而,私人信息是由私营科技公司收集的,这些公司通常是“自愿”获得的,并被中介机构用来影响公共事件、公共权力和选举——最近的丑闻就说明了这一点,这些丑闻涉及社交媒体网络的“数据农场”做法,以及将个人数据出售给政治竞选顾问,以寻求精确定位选民,从而影响全国选举和公投的结果。政府监控由来已久,但数字力量的出现使公共当局能够以更具侵入性和更有效的方式侵入我们的私人生活。最近的例子是2016年的《调查权力法案》。这些都对公共信息获取的公共监管提出了重大挑战,因为公共和私人在宪法中越来越混乱。与此同时,法院必须平衡隐私保护、公开司法和保密的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信