The influence of neuroscience

A. Bradbury
{"title":"The influence of neuroscience","authors":"A. Bradbury","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1qgnq00.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 4 focuses on the first of the two developments under consideration, the influence of neuroscience. Using ideas from critical neuroscience, it explores how scientific developments have been presented as dramatic revolutionary alternations in how we understand human nature and potential, and how in turn these ‘insights’ have been translated into education. The turn to neuroscience in education has produced particular discourses about children, including an emphasis on the first three years as a vital period of development. The chapter considers the doubts and dangers of neuroscience and the critique from researchers in Early Childhood Education especially, before considering the attractiveness of the field, and the power of the image of the brain scan. These developments are related to discourses of ability and inequalities in education through discussion of how a focus on the brain facilitates a conception of ability as biological, and how discourses of damaged brains present in policy re-inscribe conceptions of the brain as determined by background. It is argued that neuroscience as culturally constructed serves as a biopolitical frame for understanding different children’s abilities and usefulness.","PeriodicalId":254008,"journal":{"name":"Ability, Inequality and Post-Pandemic Schools","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ability, Inequality and Post-Pandemic Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qgnq00.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Chapter 4 focuses on the first of the two developments under consideration, the influence of neuroscience. Using ideas from critical neuroscience, it explores how scientific developments have been presented as dramatic revolutionary alternations in how we understand human nature and potential, and how in turn these ‘insights’ have been translated into education. The turn to neuroscience in education has produced particular discourses about children, including an emphasis on the first three years as a vital period of development. The chapter considers the doubts and dangers of neuroscience and the critique from researchers in Early Childhood Education especially, before considering the attractiveness of the field, and the power of the image of the brain scan. These developments are related to discourses of ability and inequalities in education through discussion of how a focus on the brain facilitates a conception of ability as biological, and how discourses of damaged brains present in policy re-inscribe conceptions of the brain as determined by background. It is argued that neuroscience as culturally constructed serves as a biopolitical frame for understanding different children’s abilities and usefulness.
神经科学的影响
第4章着重于考虑的两个发展中的第一个,神经科学的影响。本书利用批判性神经科学的观点,探讨了科学发展如何在我们如何理解人性和潜力方面呈现出戏剧性的革命性变化,以及这些“洞见”如何转化为教育。在教育中转向神经科学产生了关于儿童的特殊论述,包括强调头三年是发展的关键时期。在考虑该领域的吸引力和大脑扫描图像的力量之前,本章考虑了神经科学的疑虑和危险,特别是来自幼儿教育研究人员的批评。这些发展与教育中的能力和不平等的话语有关,通过讨论对大脑的关注如何促进了能力作为生物学的概念,以及政策中出现的受损大脑的话语如何重新定义了由背景决定的大脑概念。有人认为,作为文化建构的神经科学可以作为理解不同儿童能力和有用性的生物政治框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信