Design of an Idea Evaluation Method for SMEs Involving External Support Units

A. Hermann, Torsten Gollhardt, J. Becker
{"title":"Design of an Idea Evaluation Method for SMEs Involving External Support Units","authors":"A. Hermann, Torsten Gollhardt, J. Becker","doi":"10.1109/CBI54897.2022.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The joint effects of digital innovations constitute a continuous change process known as digital transformation. Every digital innovation is inevitably preceded by the initial idea for it. Furthermore, the success of innovations and, thereby, digital transformation is vitally dependent on their starting points, that is, ideas. Literature and practice observations reveal that SMEs often base their idea selection on intuitions and gut feelings rather than rigorous methods. Furthermore, they often miss the opportunity to involve external support units. Therefore, the research objective is to develop an IT-supported, criteria-based, and multi-stage idea evaluation method supporting the selection of digital innovation ideas in the context of SMEs' digital transformation. Methodologically, a design science research approach is followed. A structured literature review, two focus group discussions, and three interviews inform the artifact's design. The artifact comes with a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria embedded into a flexible evaluation method that involves an interaction concept with external supporters. Thereby, it solves a practice-inspired problem and contributes to the existing repertoire of idea management tools.","PeriodicalId":447040,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI54897.2022.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The joint effects of digital innovations constitute a continuous change process known as digital transformation. Every digital innovation is inevitably preceded by the initial idea for it. Furthermore, the success of innovations and, thereby, digital transformation is vitally dependent on their starting points, that is, ideas. Literature and practice observations reveal that SMEs often base their idea selection on intuitions and gut feelings rather than rigorous methods. Furthermore, they often miss the opportunity to involve external support units. Therefore, the research objective is to develop an IT-supported, criteria-based, and multi-stage idea evaluation method supporting the selection of digital innovation ideas in the context of SMEs' digital transformation. Methodologically, a design science research approach is followed. A structured literature review, two focus group discussions, and three interviews inform the artifact's design. The artifact comes with a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria embedded into a flexible evaluation method that involves an interaction concept with external supporters. Thereby, it solves a practice-inspired problem and contributes to the existing repertoire of idea management tools.
涉及外部支持单位的中小企业创意评价方法设计
数字化创新的共同效应构成了一个被称为数字化转型的持续变化过程。每一项数字创新都不可避免地要先有最初的想法。此外,创新的成功以及数字化转型在很大程度上取决于它们的起点,即想法。文献和实践观察表明,中小企业往往基于直觉和直觉选择想法,而不是严格的方法。此外,他们经常错过与外部支持单位合作的机会。因此,本文的研究目标是开发一种支持it支持的、基于标准的、多阶段的想法评估方法,以支持中小企业数字化转型背景下的数字创新想法选择。在方法上,遵循设计科学的研究方法。一个结构化的文献回顾,两个焦点小组讨论,和三个访谈告知了工件的设计。该工件带有一组全面的评估标准,嵌入到一个灵活的评估方法中,该方法涉及与外部支持者的交互概念。因此,它解决了一个实践启发的问题,并有助于现有的想法管理工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信