Analysis of Students’ Errors in Working on Number Theory Questions (21st century Skills)

M. M. Melissa, Cyrenia Novella Krisnamurti
{"title":"Analysis of Students’ Errors in Working on Number Theory Questions (21st century Skills)","authors":"M. M. Melissa, Cyrenia Novella Krisnamurti","doi":"10.26858/jdm.v10i3.39333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe students’ mistakes in solving number theory’s problem. In this study, error analysis, especially on the topic of Diophantine equations and Chinese remainder theorem. This type of research is qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 46 students of mathematics education at Sanata Dharma University. The data collection technique used a test. The data were analyzed to determine errors in doing number theory problems using the type of error according to Newman. According to Newman, five types of errors are reading, comprehension, transformation, process skill, and encoding errors. The conclusion of this study showed that the most errors made were related to process skill errors and transformation errors, while only a few experienced comprehension and encoding errors. None of the students made reading error.This shows that students already understand the meaning of the problem, but when changing and looking for solutions to problems an error occurs. The factors that may cause this error are a lack of understanding of the concept of the Diophantine equations and Chinese remainder theorem, as well as a lack of problem practice.","PeriodicalId":123617,"journal":{"name":"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v10i3.39333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe students’ mistakes in solving number theory’s problem. In this study, error analysis, especially on the topic of Diophantine equations and Chinese remainder theorem. This type of research is qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 46 students of mathematics education at Sanata Dharma University. The data collection technique used a test. The data were analyzed to determine errors in doing number theory problems using the type of error according to Newman. According to Newman, five types of errors are reading, comprehension, transformation, process skill, and encoding errors. The conclusion of this study showed that the most errors made were related to process skill errors and transformation errors, while only a few experienced comprehension and encoding errors. None of the students made reading error.This shows that students already understand the meaning of the problem, but when changing and looking for solutions to problems an error occurs. The factors that may cause this error are a lack of understanding of the concept of the Diophantine equations and Chinese remainder theorem, as well as a lack of problem practice.
学生在21世纪技能数论题中的错误分析
本研究旨在描述学生在解决数论问题时所犯的错误。在本研究中,误差分析,特别是丢番图方程和中国剩余定理的题目。这种类型的研究是定性研究。本研究以三观达摩大学数学教育专业46名学生为研究对象。数据收集技术使用了一个测试。根据纽曼的说法,对数据进行分析,以确定在做数论问题时使用错误类型的错误。根据纽曼的说法,五种类型的错误是阅读、理解、转换、处理技能和编码错误。本研究的结论表明,学生犯的错误主要是加工技能错误和转换错误,而理解和编码错误较少。没有一个学生犯阅读错误。这表明学生已经理解了问题的含义,但是在改变和寻找问题的解决方案时发生了错误。造成这种错误的原因是对丢番图方程和中国剩余定理的概念认识不足,以及缺乏问题实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信