Converting Retirement Benefit into a Life Care Annuity with Graded Benefits: How Costly Would It Actually Be?

Javier Pla-Porcel, M. Ventura-Marco, Carlos Vidal-Meliá
{"title":"Converting Retirement Benefit into a Life Care Annuity with Graded Benefits: How Costly Would It Actually Be?","authors":"Javier Pla-Porcel, M. Ventura-Marco, Carlos Vidal-Meliá","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2801651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with life care annuities, i.e. bundled products comprising a life annuity and long-term care insurance. It aims to assess the cost of converting retirement benefit into a life care annuity with graded benefits using a pre-existing public pay-as-you-go pension scheme. With this objective in mind, we present an actuarial method based on array calculus for valuing this type of life care annuity. The health dynamics of the annuitant rely on a reversible illness-death multistate framework. The paper contains a numerical example in which mortality and disability assumptions are based on data from the USA and Australia, although this should be viewed simply as an illustration. In addition, in order to check the coherence of these data, we compute life expectancy for both healthy and dependent persons, and then for dependent persons in each of the states of dependence. The effect of ruling out the recovery assumption on the annuity's cost is also assessed. The analysis provides valuable insights into how much it would cost to introduce these annuities and enables us to make some policy recommendations to help ensure that this combined pension scheme has a good actuarial design. If the data used were the real data, it would be no exaggeration to say that embedding long-term care coverage into the retirement system in the USA might not be very costly, whereas for Australia the opposite would be true.","PeriodicalId":430314,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)","volume":"206 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2801651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper deals with life care annuities, i.e. bundled products comprising a life annuity and long-term care insurance. It aims to assess the cost of converting retirement benefit into a life care annuity with graded benefits using a pre-existing public pay-as-you-go pension scheme. With this objective in mind, we present an actuarial method based on array calculus for valuing this type of life care annuity. The health dynamics of the annuitant rely on a reversible illness-death multistate framework. The paper contains a numerical example in which mortality and disability assumptions are based on data from the USA and Australia, although this should be viewed simply as an illustration. In addition, in order to check the coherence of these data, we compute life expectancy for both healthy and dependent persons, and then for dependent persons in each of the states of dependence. The effect of ruling out the recovery assumption on the annuity's cost is also assessed. The analysis provides valuable insights into how much it would cost to introduce these annuities and enables us to make some policy recommendations to help ensure that this combined pension scheme has a good actuarial design. If the data used were the real data, it would be no exaggeration to say that embedding long-term care coverage into the retirement system in the USA might not be very costly, whereas for Australia the opposite would be true.
将退休福利转换为具有分级福利的人寿保险年金:实际成本有多高?
本文涉及的生活护理年金,即捆绑产品包括生活年金和长期护理保险。它的目的是评估将退休福利转换为使用预先存在的公共现收现付养老金计划的分级福利的终身护理年金的成本。考虑到这一目标,我们提出了一种基于数组演算的精算方法来评估这种类型的生活护理年金。养老金领取者的健康动态依赖于可逆的疾病-死亡多状态框架。该文件包含一个数值例子,其中死亡率和残疾假设是基于美国和澳大利亚的数据,尽管这应被视为一个简单的说明。此外,为了检验这些数据的一致性,我们计算了健康人和依赖者的预期寿命,然后计算了处于每种依赖状态的依赖者的预期寿命。排除回收假设对年金成本的影响也进行了评估。该分析对引入这些年金的成本提供了有价值的见解,并使我们能够提出一些政策建议,以帮助确保这种综合养老金计划具有良好的精算设计。如果使用的数据是真实的数据,可以毫不夸张地说,在美国,将长期护理覆盖纳入退休体系可能不会非常昂贵,而在澳大利亚,情况正好相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信