Close Intimate Relations between People with Intellectual Disabilities Constructivist Research: The Polish Perspective

Remigiusz Kijak
{"title":"Close Intimate Relations between People with Intellectual Disabilities Constructivist Research: The Polish Perspective","authors":"Remigiusz Kijak","doi":"10.52291/ijse.2020.35.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issues raised in this article are not often mentioned in the source literature. Available studies demonstrate that partnership issues for people with intellectual disabilities appear to be among the ignored problems. Empirical evidence indicates the participation of people with disabilities in the realization of these roles, but their realization is burdened with difficulties resulting from individual predispositions and social conditions. I am directing my research on partner relationships towards a constructivist–interpretative paradigm based on ontological relativism (the multiplicity of meanings given to the category of relationship can be observed at this point, arising in subjective reconstructions—statements—of the people surveyed), subjective epistemology (arising in the course of the research, which is co-created by the cognitor and the subject), and the naturalism of methodological procedures, which means the rejection of advanced statistics in favor of cognition of the true experiences of the subjects. I have assumed a qualitative nature for the research and the biographical method was used. The research aimed to answer the questions: How are the relationships of people with intellectual disabilities understood? What meaning do people with intellectual disabilities assign to love and relationships and their own intimate relations (sexuality)? A literal linguistic analysis of the statements of those tested with the Atlas.ti software is presented in the results. The article depicts the way people with intellectual disabilities describe their relationships, how they feel in the relationships they create, and thus, what linguistic means of expression they use to communicate their intentions and expectations with respect to their partner.","PeriodicalId":280146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Special Education (IJSE)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Special Education (IJSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2020.35.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issues raised in this article are not often mentioned in the source literature. Available studies demonstrate that partnership issues for people with intellectual disabilities appear to be among the ignored problems. Empirical evidence indicates the participation of people with disabilities in the realization of these roles, but their realization is burdened with difficulties resulting from individual predispositions and social conditions. I am directing my research on partner relationships towards a constructivist–interpretative paradigm based on ontological relativism (the multiplicity of meanings given to the category of relationship can be observed at this point, arising in subjective reconstructions—statements—of the people surveyed), subjective epistemology (arising in the course of the research, which is co-created by the cognitor and the subject), and the naturalism of methodological procedures, which means the rejection of advanced statistics in favor of cognition of the true experiences of the subjects. I have assumed a qualitative nature for the research and the biographical method was used. The research aimed to answer the questions: How are the relationships of people with intellectual disabilities understood? What meaning do people with intellectual disabilities assign to love and relationships and their own intimate relations (sexuality)? A literal linguistic analysis of the statements of those tested with the Atlas.ti software is presented in the results. The article depicts the way people with intellectual disabilities describe their relationships, how they feel in the relationships they create, and thus, what linguistic means of expression they use to communicate their intentions and expectations with respect to their partner.
智障人士亲密关系的建构主义研究:波兰视角
本文中提出的问题在原始文献中不常被提及。现有的研究表明,智障人士的伴侣关系问题似乎是被忽视的问题之一。经验证据表明,残疾人参与了这些角色的实现,但由于个人倾向和社会条件,他们的实现面临着困难。我将我对伴侣关系的研究引向一种建构主义-解释范式,这种范式基于本体论相对主义(此时可以观察到赋予关系范畴的多重意义,产生于被调查者的主观重构-陈述)、主观认识论(产生于研究过程中,由认知者和主体共同创造)和方法论程序的自然主义,这意味着拒绝高级统计数据,支持对受试者真实经验的认知。我假设了研究的定性性质,并使用了传记方法。这项研究旨在回答以下问题:如何理解智障人士之间的关系?智障人士对爱情、人际关系和他们自己的亲密关系(性)赋予了什么意义?对阿特拉斯测试者陈述的文字语言分析。结果中给出了Ti软件。这篇文章描述了智障人士描述他们的关系的方式,他们在他们创造的关系中的感受,以及他们使用什么语言表达方式来表达他们对伴侣的意图和期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信