‘Showcasing Empire’ Past & Present Or A Brief History of Popular Imperialism, from Britannia to Brexit

Berny Sèbe
{"title":"‘Showcasing Empire’ Past & Present Or A Brief History of Popular Imperialism, from Britannia to Brexit","authors":"Berny Sèbe","doi":"10.4000/cve.9144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can a genealogy be established between Britannia (Thomas Arne composed Rule Britannia in 1740) and Brexit? Whilst the concept of Empire 2.0 has often been used to engage with the range of reasons put forward by Brexiteers to support the principle of a breakaway from the EU, commentators have often neglected the long-term ramifications of the feelings that may have played a role in the choice of 52% of the British population in the summer of 2016. Yet, a longue duree approach reveals compelling continuities over several centuries. Historiographical developments since the 1980s have pointed towards the persisting influence of the imperial experience on the DNA of British culture and politics. This was reflected in a range of cultural manifestations reaching large constituencies of the population of the British Isles—what John MacKenzie has termed ‘Popular Imperialism’. This paper explores the hypothesis that this deeply rooted attachment to the Empire has been running consistently (although at varying degrees) at least since the eighteenth century, and has found a new lease of life among supporters of the Brexit process, who have celebrated often implicitly the strength of the imperial legacy as a suitable alternative to the EU project. Spanning three centuries of British cultural history, this paper offers a provocative insight into the long-term dynamics that have made the unthinkable possible: that one of the leading proponents of post-war European cooperation and free trade, would decide one day to turn its back to the ideals it had actively promoted—for instance, as a founding member of the Council of Europe.","PeriodicalId":242548,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens","volume":"30 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/cve.9144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Can a genealogy be established between Britannia (Thomas Arne composed Rule Britannia in 1740) and Brexit? Whilst the concept of Empire 2.0 has often been used to engage with the range of reasons put forward by Brexiteers to support the principle of a breakaway from the EU, commentators have often neglected the long-term ramifications of the feelings that may have played a role in the choice of 52% of the British population in the summer of 2016. Yet, a longue duree approach reveals compelling continuities over several centuries. Historiographical developments since the 1980s have pointed towards the persisting influence of the imperial experience on the DNA of British culture and politics. This was reflected in a range of cultural manifestations reaching large constituencies of the population of the British Isles—what John MacKenzie has termed ‘Popular Imperialism’. This paper explores the hypothesis that this deeply rooted attachment to the Empire has been running consistently (although at varying degrees) at least since the eighteenth century, and has found a new lease of life among supporters of the Brexit process, who have celebrated often implicitly the strength of the imperial legacy as a suitable alternative to the EU project. Spanning three centuries of British cultural history, this paper offers a provocative insight into the long-term dynamics that have made the unthinkable possible: that one of the leading proponents of post-war European cooperation and free trade, would decide one day to turn its back to the ideals it had actively promoted—for instance, as a founding member of the Council of Europe.
“展示帝国”的过去与现在或通俗帝国主义简史,从不列颠尼亚到英国脱欧
不列颠尼亚(托马斯·阿恩于1740年创作了《不列颠尼亚规则》)和英国脱欧之间能否建立宗谱?虽然“帝国2.0”的概念经常被用来与脱欧派提出的支持脱离欧盟原则的一系列理由联系在一起,但评论员们往往忽视了这种情绪的长期影响,这种影响可能在2016年夏天52%的英国人的选择中发挥了作用。然而,长时间的研究揭示了几个世纪以来令人信服的连续性。自20世纪80年代以来,史学的发展表明,帝国经历对英国文化和政治DNA的持续影响。这反映在一系列文化表现中,影响了不列颠群岛上大量人口的选区——约翰·麦肯齐称之为“大众帝国主义”。本文探讨了这样一种假设,即至少自18世纪以来,这种对帝国根深蒂固的依恋一直持续(尽管程度不同),并且在英国脱欧进程的支持者中找到了新的生命,他们经常含蓄地庆祝帝国遗产的力量,认为这是欧盟项目的合适选择。跨越三个世纪的英国文化史,本文对使不可想象成为可能的长期动态提供了一个具有挑衅性的见解:战后欧洲合作和自由贸易的主要支持者之一,有一天会决定背弃它积极推动的理想-例如,作为欧洲委员会的创始成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信