Quality Assessment and Certification in Open Scholarly Publishing and Inspiration for MOOC Credentialing

Xiang Ren
{"title":"Quality Assessment and Certification in Open Scholarly Publishing and Inspiration for MOOC Credentialing","authors":"Xiang Ren","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-8856-8.CH013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the changing landscape of quality assessment and certification/credentialing in open knowledge systems by a comparative study between open publishing and open education. Despite the disruptive changes driven by open publishing in scholarly communication, it is challenging to develop widely accepted methods for quality assessment and certification. Similar challenges exist in open education platforms like the massive open online course (MOOC). This work reviews four types of innovations in open publishing in terms of quality control, namely “light touch” peer review, post-publication assessment, social peer review, and open peer review. Synthesising the principles and strategies of these innovations, it discusses how they might be inspiring for developing solutions and models for MOOC assessment and credentialing. This chapter concludes by suggesting future research directions. It argues that the open initiatives are co-evolving with the “traditional” systems and integrating with the established models.","PeriodicalId":144710,"journal":{"name":"Scholarly Ethics and Publishing","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholarly Ethics and Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8856-8.CH013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter looks at the changing landscape of quality assessment and certification/credentialing in open knowledge systems by a comparative study between open publishing and open education. Despite the disruptive changes driven by open publishing in scholarly communication, it is challenging to develop widely accepted methods for quality assessment and certification. Similar challenges exist in open education platforms like the massive open online course (MOOC). This work reviews four types of innovations in open publishing in terms of quality control, namely “light touch” peer review, post-publication assessment, social peer review, and open peer review. Synthesising the principles and strategies of these innovations, it discusses how they might be inspiring for developing solutions and models for MOOC assessment and credentialing. This chapter concludes by suggesting future research directions. It argues that the open initiatives are co-evolving with the “traditional” systems and integrating with the established models.
开放学术出版质量评估与认证及对MOOC认证的启示
本章通过对开放出版和开放教育的比较研究,探讨开放知识系统中质量评估和认证/资格认证的变化情况。尽管开放出版在学术交流中推动了破坏性的变化,但开发广泛接受的质量评估和认证方法仍是一项挑战。类似的挑战也存在于大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)等开放教育平台上。本文综述了开放出版在质量控制方面的四种创新,即“轻触式”同行评议、出版后评估、社会同行评议和开放同行评议。本文综合了这些创新的原则和策略,讨论了它们对开发MOOC评估和认证的解决方案和模式的启发。最后提出了未来的研究方向。它认为,开放倡议正在与“传统”系统共同发展,并与已建立的模型集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信