Conclusion

C. Allen
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"C. Allen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198832263.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter summarizes the findings of the investigation and points to some avenues of future research. The dative external possessor was always a marked construction in English, used especially with actions involving a negative effect on the possessor, with the internal possessor being the default construction early in the Old English period, even with highly affected possessors. While much has been made of the oddness of English in not having the construction any more, scant attention has been given to the fact that variation between internal and dative external possessors was a feature of all early Germanic languages, and the distinction between the two types of possessors has sharpened on the continent, where language contact may have strengthened the position of the dative construction. More research is needed in the development of dative external possessors in other Germanic languages.","PeriodicalId":251092,"journal":{"name":"Dative External Possessors in Early English","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dative External Possessors in Early English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832263.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the findings of the investigation and points to some avenues of future research. The dative external possessor was always a marked construction in English, used especially with actions involving a negative effect on the possessor, with the internal possessor being the default construction early in the Old English period, even with highly affected possessors. While much has been made of the oddness of English in not having the construction any more, scant attention has been given to the fact that variation between internal and dative external possessors was a feature of all early Germanic languages, and the distinction between the two types of possessors has sharpened on the continent, where language contact may have strengthened the position of the dative construction. More research is needed in the development of dative external possessors in other Germanic languages.
结论
本章总结了调查结果,并指出了未来研究的一些途径。在英语中,外部所有格一直是一个标记结构,特别是用于对所有格有负面影响的行为,内部所有格是古英语早期的默认结构,即使是高度受影响的所有格。虽然人们对英语不再有这种结构的奇怪之处做了很多讨论,但很少有人注意到这样一个事实,即所有早期日耳曼语言的一个特征是内部和与格外部所有格之间的变化,这两种类型的所有格之间的区别在欧洲大陆上变得更加明显,在那里,语言接触可能加强了与格结构的地位。在其他日耳曼语言中,与格外部所有格的发展还需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信