Managerial Myopia and Non-Financial Measures: The Case of Customer Satisfaction Mitigating Hard-Selling

A. Thevaranjan, K. Joseph, Dhinu Srinivasan
{"title":"Managerial Myopia and Non-Financial Measures: The Case of Customer Satisfaction Mitigating Hard-Selling","authors":"A. Thevaranjan, K. Joseph, Dhinu Srinivasan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.208388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, firms are augmenting financial measures of performance with non-financial measures of performance with a view to instill a long-run focus and reduce managerial myopia. Thus, in this paper, we utilize an agency-theoretic model to examine closely how financial measures cause managerial myopia and how non-financial measures mitigate managerial myopia. To this effect, we explicitly model a specific myopic behavior within the personal selling function, namely, hard-selling. In this context, we find that incentives based on financial measures (gross profits) do not always cause managerial myopia and that non-financial measures (customer satisfaction) are not always useful in mitigating managerial myopia. However, when non-financial measures are useful, we find that they can serve two different roles, namely, suppressing hard-selling and enhancing the utilization of the financial measure. Moreover, their introduction can either increase or decrease the weight placed on financial measures. Finally, we find that improvements in the precision of non-financial measures increase both the weight placed on non-financial measures as well as the weight placed on financial measures. Key Words: Non-financial measures; Agency theory; Salesforce compensation","PeriodicalId":272257,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.208388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Increasingly, firms are augmenting financial measures of performance with non-financial measures of performance with a view to instill a long-run focus and reduce managerial myopia. Thus, in this paper, we utilize an agency-theoretic model to examine closely how financial measures cause managerial myopia and how non-financial measures mitigate managerial myopia. To this effect, we explicitly model a specific myopic behavior within the personal selling function, namely, hard-selling. In this context, we find that incentives based on financial measures (gross profits) do not always cause managerial myopia and that non-financial measures (customer satisfaction) are not always useful in mitigating managerial myopia. However, when non-financial measures are useful, we find that they can serve two different roles, namely, suppressing hard-selling and enhancing the utilization of the financial measure. Moreover, their introduction can either increase or decrease the weight placed on financial measures. Finally, we find that improvements in the precision of non-financial measures increase both the weight placed on non-financial measures as well as the weight placed on financial measures. Key Words: Non-financial measures; Agency theory; Salesforce compensation
管理短视与非财务措施:顾客满意减轻硬卖案例
越来越多的公司正在用非财务的业绩衡量来增加业绩的财务衡量,以期灌输一种长期的关注和减少管理的短视。因此,在本文中,我们利用一个代理理论模型来仔细研究财务措施是如何导致管理近视的,而非财务措施是如何缓解管理近视的。为此,我们明确地在个人销售功能中建立了一种特定的短视行为模型,即硬性销售。在这种情况下,我们发现基于财务措施(毛利润)的激励并不总是导致管理短视,而非财务措施(客户满意度)并不总是有助于减轻管理短视。然而,当非财务措施发挥作用时,我们发现它们可以起到两种不同的作用,即抑制硬推销和提高财务措施的利用率。此外,它们的引入可以增加或减少对财政措施的重视。最后,我们发现,非财务指标精度的提高既增加了非财务指标的权重,也增加了财务指标的权重。关键词:非财务措施;代理理论;Salesforce补偿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信