Teachers’ Professional Self-Efficacy for Collaboration: A Comparison Between European Countries

Kristine Kampmane, A. Geske, A. Ozola
{"title":"Teachers’ Professional Self-Efficacy for Collaboration: A Comparison Between European Countries","authors":"Kristine Kampmane, A. Geske, A. Ozola","doi":"10.22364/atee.2022.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the understanding of non-cognitive skills and their importance have grown, it becomes more and more significant to measure their impact on different areas of professional life. It has been researched that not only individual teacher’s professional self-efficacy, but also collective self-efficacy has a significant impact on both the teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ achievement. The purpose of this study is to select a set of factors that correlate with teachers’ professional self-efficacy and to analyse if teachers’ professional self-efficacy has an impact on teachers’ cooperation with colleagues and students. Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, and Finnish data from the OECD TALIS 2018 teacher questionnaires were used. o analyse which factors correlate with teachers’ professional self-efficacy, the authors of this article selected such variables as the type of school, the type of urbanization, the number of special education students in the class, full time or partial time employment, professional development courses and the professional development at university level. The authors found that there were no significant correlations between the type of school, the type of urbanization, and the number of special education students in the classroom, but there was a significant correlation between professional development courses and the professional development during the university study period. The teachers who worked full time job were more self-efficient than others. To study the impact of self-efficacy on collaboration, the authors of this article selected variables that represented teacher – student collaboration and teacher – teacher collaboration. The professional self-efficacy scale was partitioned into four efficacy levels and each level was analysed with answers from each variable. The group comparison and the linear regression analysis showed that teachers with higher self-efficacy levels cooperated more and better with students and colleagues. Thus, this research adds supplementary evidence to studies showing the importance of professional self-efficacy development.","PeriodicalId":286803,"journal":{"name":"To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/atee.2022.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the understanding of non-cognitive skills and their importance have grown, it becomes more and more significant to measure their impact on different areas of professional life. It has been researched that not only individual teacher’s professional self-efficacy, but also collective self-efficacy has a significant impact on both the teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ achievement. The purpose of this study is to select a set of factors that correlate with teachers’ professional self-efficacy and to analyse if teachers’ professional self-efficacy has an impact on teachers’ cooperation with colleagues and students. Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, and Finnish data from the OECD TALIS 2018 teacher questionnaires were used. o analyse which factors correlate with teachers’ professional self-efficacy, the authors of this article selected such variables as the type of school, the type of urbanization, the number of special education students in the class, full time or partial time employment, professional development courses and the professional development at university level. The authors found that there were no significant correlations between the type of school, the type of urbanization, and the number of special education students in the classroom, but there was a significant correlation between professional development courses and the professional development during the university study period. The teachers who worked full time job were more self-efficient than others. To study the impact of self-efficacy on collaboration, the authors of this article selected variables that represented teacher – student collaboration and teacher – teacher collaboration. The professional self-efficacy scale was partitioned into four efficacy levels and each level was analysed with answers from each variable. The group comparison and the linear regression analysis showed that teachers with higher self-efficacy levels cooperated more and better with students and colleagues. Thus, this research adds supplementary evidence to studies showing the importance of professional self-efficacy development.
欧洲国家教师协作专业自我效能感比较
随着对非认知技能及其重要性的理解不断加深,衡量它们对职业生活不同领域的影响变得越来越重要。研究发现,不仅教师个体的专业自我效能感,集体自我效能感对教师自我效能感和学生成绩都有显著的影响。本研究的目的是选择一组与教师专业自我效能感相关的因素,分析教师专业自我效能感是否对教师与同事和学生的合作产生影响。使用了经合组织TALIS 2018年教师问卷中的拉脱维亚、立陶宛、爱沙尼亚、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和芬兰的数据。为了分析哪些因素与教师的专业自我效能感相关,本文选取了学校类型、城市化类型、班级特殊教育学生人数、全职或兼职就业、专业发展课程和大学水平的专业发展等变量。研究发现,学校类型、城市化类型与特殊教育学生人数之间不存在显著的相关关系,但专业发展课程与大学学习期间的专业发展之间存在显著的相关关系。全职教师的自我效能高于其他教师。为了研究自我效能感对合作的影响,本文选取了代表师生合作和老师与老师合作的变量。将职业自我效能感量表划分为四个效能水平,并对每个水平进行分析,给出每个变量的答案。组间比较和线性回归分析表明,自我效能水平较高的教师与学生和同事的合作更多、更好。因此,本研究为专业自我效能发展重要性的研究提供了补充证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信