{"title":"Oral Repeated Reading at Audio-Assisted Repeated Reading Bilang Interbensyon sa Kasanayan ng mga Mga Mag-aaral sa Gawaing Pagbasa","authors":"Maria Luz D. Calibayan, Jame Amigos Valenia","doi":"10.57200/apjsbs.v20i0.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \n This study intends to determine whether audio-assisted repeated reading or oral repeated reading could really help in the accuracy, speed and comprehension on the text reading. It aimed to answer the following: (1) to determine the level of learning in reading of the students in pretest according to accuracy, speed and comprehension before audio-assisted repeated reading and oral repeated reading are done; (2) to determine the level of learning in reading of the students in the posttest according to accuracy, speed and comprehension after doing the audio-assisted repeated reading and oral repeated reading as intervention; 3) to determine if there is a significant difference on accuracy, speed and comprehension in the posttest of students on audio-assisted repeated reading and oral repeated reading; and (4) to determine whether of the two strategies sing no page saying on paper they burned it chamois deepa insertaudio-assisted repeated reading or oral repeated reading helped slow readers improve their accuracy, speed and comprehension. \n Students from Grade 7 of Matalam High School, Cotabato were the participants of the study. Fot the research design of the study Quasi-experimental was utilized. Quantitative-Normative comparison was used in assessing the results of oral repeated reading and audio-assisted repeated reading while descriptive-qualitative was utilized in the focus group discussion. \n It was found out that the accuracy and speed in reading increased when oral repeated reading and audio-assisted repeated reading were utilized. \n T-test for dependent samples was utilized in determining the accuracy, speed and comprehension for the pretest and posttest of the participants. T-test for independent samples was used in testing the relationship of the results in audio-assisted repeated reading and oral repeated reading. \n In summary, any of the two strategies could aid to enhance the accuracy, speed and comprehension in text reading among students who are slow in reading activity. \n \n \nAbstrak \n Nilayon ng pag-aaral na ito na matukoy kung alin sa audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading ang higit na makatulong sa kasanayan ng mga mag-aaral kaugnay sa kawastuhan, bilis at pag-unawa sa binasang teksto. Sinikap na sagutin ang mga sumusunod: (1) Matukoy ang antas ng kasanayan sa pagbasa ng mga mag-aaral sa pretest hinggil sa kawastuhan, bilis at pag-unawa bago isagawa ang audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading; (2) Matukoy ang antas ng kasanayan sa pagbasa ng mga mag-aaral sa posttest kaugnay sa kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa pagkatapos maisagawa ang audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading bilang interbensyon; (3) Matukoy kung may makabuluhang pagkakaiba ang kawastuhan, bilis at pag-unawa sa posttest ng mga mag-aaral sa audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading. (4) Madetermina kung alin sa audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading ang nakatulong upang mapaangat ang kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa ng mga mag-aaral na may kahinaan sa pagbasa. Saklaw ng pag-aaral na ito ang mga mag-aaral na kabilang sa Grade 7 ng Matalam High School na matatagpuan sa Matalam, Cotabato. \n Ginamit sa pag-aaral ang disenyong quasi-experimental. Sa kwantitatibong pamamaraan para sa pagsuri sa resulta ng oral repeated reading at audio-assisted repeated reading ginamit ang normative comparison samantalang sa kwalitatibong pamamaraan kaugnay sa deskriptibong pagsusuri ginamit ang focus group discussion. \n Natuklasan na umangat ang kawastuhan at bilis sa pagbasa ng mga mag-aaral nang gamitan ng oral repeated reading at audio-assisted repeated reading. \n Sa pagsusuri, ginamit ang t-test for dependent samples upang suriin ang kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa sa pretest at posttest ng mga kahalok. Ginamit naman ang t-test for independent samples upang suriin ang kaugnayan ng resulta sa audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading. \n Sa kabuuan, alinman sa dalawang estratehiya ay parehong nakatutulong upang pahusayin ang kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa sa binasang teksto ng mga mag-aaral na may kahinaan sa gawaing pagbasa. \n \n ","PeriodicalId":233251,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57200/apjsbs.v20i0.315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract
This study intends to determine whether audio-assisted repeated reading or oral repeated reading could really help in the accuracy, speed and comprehension on the text reading. It aimed to answer the following: (1) to determine the level of learning in reading of the students in pretest according to accuracy, speed and comprehension before audio-assisted repeated reading and oral repeated reading are done; (2) to determine the level of learning in reading of the students in the posttest according to accuracy, speed and comprehension after doing the audio-assisted repeated reading and oral repeated reading as intervention; 3) to determine if there is a significant difference on accuracy, speed and comprehension in the posttest of students on audio-assisted repeated reading and oral repeated reading; and (4) to determine whether of the two strategies sing no page saying on paper they burned it chamois deepa insertaudio-assisted repeated reading or oral repeated reading helped slow readers improve their accuracy, speed and comprehension.
Students from Grade 7 of Matalam High School, Cotabato were the participants of the study. Fot the research design of the study Quasi-experimental was utilized. Quantitative-Normative comparison was used in assessing the results of oral repeated reading and audio-assisted repeated reading while descriptive-qualitative was utilized in the focus group discussion.
It was found out that the accuracy and speed in reading increased when oral repeated reading and audio-assisted repeated reading were utilized.
T-test for dependent samples was utilized in determining the accuracy, speed and comprehension for the pretest and posttest of the participants. T-test for independent samples was used in testing the relationship of the results in audio-assisted repeated reading and oral repeated reading.
In summary, any of the two strategies could aid to enhance the accuracy, speed and comprehension in text reading among students who are slow in reading activity.
Abstrak
Nilayon ng pag-aaral na ito na matukoy kung alin sa audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading ang higit na makatulong sa kasanayan ng mga mag-aaral kaugnay sa kawastuhan, bilis at pag-unawa sa binasang teksto. Sinikap na sagutin ang mga sumusunod: (1) Matukoy ang antas ng kasanayan sa pagbasa ng mga mag-aaral sa pretest hinggil sa kawastuhan, bilis at pag-unawa bago isagawa ang audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading; (2) Matukoy ang antas ng kasanayan sa pagbasa ng mga mag-aaral sa posttest kaugnay sa kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa pagkatapos maisagawa ang audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading bilang interbensyon; (3) Matukoy kung may makabuluhang pagkakaiba ang kawastuhan, bilis at pag-unawa sa posttest ng mga mag-aaral sa audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading. (4) Madetermina kung alin sa audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading ang nakatulong upang mapaangat ang kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa ng mga mag-aaral na may kahinaan sa pagbasa. Saklaw ng pag-aaral na ito ang mga mag-aaral na kabilang sa Grade 7 ng Matalam High School na matatagpuan sa Matalam, Cotabato.
Ginamit sa pag-aaral ang disenyong quasi-experimental. Sa kwantitatibong pamamaraan para sa pagsuri sa resulta ng oral repeated reading at audio-assisted repeated reading ginamit ang normative comparison samantalang sa kwalitatibong pamamaraan kaugnay sa deskriptibong pagsusuri ginamit ang focus group discussion.
Natuklasan na umangat ang kawastuhan at bilis sa pagbasa ng mga mag-aaral nang gamitan ng oral repeated reading at audio-assisted repeated reading.
Sa pagsusuri, ginamit ang t-test for dependent samples upang suriin ang kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa sa pretest at posttest ng mga kahalok. Ginamit naman ang t-test for independent samples upang suriin ang kaugnayan ng resulta sa audio-assisted repeated reading at oral repeated reading.
Sa kabuuan, alinman sa dalawang estratehiya ay parehong nakatutulong upang pahusayin ang kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa sa binasang teksto ng mga mag-aaral na may kahinaan sa gawaing pagbasa.
摘要本研究旨在确定听力辅助重复阅读与口语重复阅读是否真正有助于文本阅读的准确性、速度和理解力。本研究旨在回答以下问题:(1)在进行听力辅助重复阅读和口语重复阅读前,根据学生阅读的准确性、速度和理解力来判断前测学生的阅读学习水平;(2)以听力辅助重复阅读和口语重复阅读为干预,根据准确性、速度和理解力来判断学生在后测的阅读学习水平;3)确定学生在听力辅助重复阅读和口语重复阅读后测中的准确性、速度和理解能力是否存在显著差异;(4)为了确定这两种策略是否能帮助慢速读者提高阅读的准确性、速度和理解力。来自哥打巴托Matalam高中七年级的学生是这项研究的参与者。本研究的研究设计采用准实验设计。口头重复阅读和听力辅助重复阅读的评估结果采用定量-规范比较,焦点小组讨论采用描述-定性比较。结果表明,采用口语重复阅读和语音辅助重复阅读均能提高阅读的准确性和速度。采用依赖样本的t检验来确定参与者前测和后测的准确性、速度和理解力。采用独立样本t检验,检验语音辅助重复阅读与口语重复阅读结果的关系。综上所述,这两种策略中的任何一种都有助于提高阅读活动缓慢的学生阅读文本的准确性、速度和理解力。【摘要】听力辅助重复阅读在口语重复阅读中的应用,听力辅助重复阅读在口语重复阅读中的应用,听力辅助重复阅读在口语重复阅读中的应用,听力辅助重复阅读在口语重复阅读中的应用。(1) Matukoy ang antas ng kasanayan sa pagbasa ng mga maga -aaral sa pretest hinggil sa kawastuhan, bilis at pag-unawa bago isagawa and辅助性重复阅读在口语重复阅读;(2) Matukoy ang antas ng kasanayan sa pagbasa ng maga -aaral sa后测kaugnay sa kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa pagkatapos maisagawa和语音辅助重复阅读在口语重复阅读bilang间歇;(3) Matukoy kung may makabuluhang pagkakaiba ang kawastuhan, bilis at pag-unawa sa posttest; mga mag-aaral sa辅助性重复阅读at口语重复阅读。(4) Madetermina kung alin sa语音辅助重复阅读在口语重复阅读ang nakatulong upang mapaangat ang kawastuhan, bilis, at pag-unawa ng mga mag-aaral na may kahinaan sa pagbasa。Saklaw ng pag-aaral na to ang maga -aaral na kabilang sa 7年级ng Matalam高中na matatagpuan sa Matalam,哥打巴托省。吉纳米特说:“这是一个准实验。”Sa kwantitatibong pamamaraan para Sa pagsuri Sa结果口语重复阅读辅助重复阅读ginamit ang规范比较samantalang Sa kwalitatibong pamamaraan kaugnay Sa deskriptibong pagsusuri ginamit ang焦点小组讨论。Natuklasan na unmangat ang kawastuhan at bilis sa pagbasa ng mga mag-aaral nang gamitan在语音辅助重复阅读。Sa pagsusuri, ginamit和t-检验对依赖样本的影响,在pani - surin和kawastuhan, bilis,在pagi -unawa,在mga kahalok前测试。Ginamit naman对独立样本进行t检验,结果表明语音辅助重复阅读在口语重复阅读中的作用。Sa kabuuan, alinman Sa dalawang estratehihiya ay parehong nakatutulong upang pahusayin ang kawastuhan, bilis, at pagu -unawa Sa binasang tekstong mga magi -aaral na may kahinaan and Sa gawaing pagbasa。